SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry Maloney who wrote (423340)2/26/2013 9:13:26 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Nobody seems to be taking this sequestration thing seriously, including the markets. What's up with that?
Maybe it's because "sequestration" sounds like something from a BDSM session and most Wall St. traders are very comfortable in that regard?



To: Terry Maloney who wrote (423340)2/27/2013 7:01:15 AM
From: MythMan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
they recall the fiscal cliff stuff. That too was meaningless and the markets took off on a tear after that.



To: Terry Maloney who wrote (423340)2/27/2013 8:15:39 AM
From: ggersh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Sequester....bullish
Italian elections ....bullish
Jap whatever .....bullish
Sunrise......bullish
sunset ....bullish
Chinese PMI.....bullish
horsemeat.......bullish
33% of fish mislabeled.....bullish
pharma drugs kill....bullish
O'care costs more ......bullish
payroll tax higher.....bullish
gas price higher.....bullish
bernanke clueless....bullish

what on earth means failure anymore?

BWDIK


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News