Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (1929)	12/5/1997 6:45:00 PM
From: Mr Metals	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

Mr Charters Could you please give me your professional opinion on this company's assay results. They seem very significant in my opinion. techstocks.com Mr Metals

To: E. Charters who wrote (1929)	12/6/1997 11:45:00 AM
From: CLK	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

This discussion about INCO raises another question. The head of Incos overseas exploration division just left to head FNX.T which has as one of its main draws the fact that Inco owns 25% of the stock. SO if Inco will be strong, FNX should eventually end up with a cast off project of some merit for a junior but if INCO really ends up weak, then one wonders if FNX will really benefit much. Are you favorable or unfavorable towards FNX? Do you think INCO will be strong or weak? The bottom line of this question is whether you think FNX is a good speculation in the .50-.65 cdn range. They have .50 cdn in cash so I figure it is probably a decent bottom fish there at the least?