Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (98958)	3/3/2013 2:55:23 AM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Respond to of 217588

i already have, wrote project #2 to zero

To: average joe who wrote (98958)	3/3/2013 4:52:25 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 217588

the capital we the boyz have at the burning stake of project #2 (gold / antimony) that as far as i am concerned is impaired by way of the 80/20 (stepped up value basis for the 20%) jv is comprised of the option money, the first downpayment, and the due diligence expenses. the sums ordinarily would be material especially as first step of the usual p.e. deals. i am telling the boyz to forget spilt milk and hope for the best, because as and when project #1 (gold / mill) powers up whether or not exactly per schedule, the spilt milk would materialize into so many cows in short order that we would not even remember #2 should it actually go to zero. as long as project #1 powers up, we are beautiful then there is #3, the tailings venture