SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (703078)3/7/2013 7:43:48 AM
From: jlallen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1578704
 
You are truly clueless. What a pathetic excuse for a human you are....there's no way you should be allowed to vote....you are just too damn stupid.



To: tejek who wrote (703078)3/7/2013 9:29:55 AM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578704
 
In a Quinnipiac poll out Thursday, the ex-New York senator Clintoon beats all comers in the 2016 presidential field in hypothetical match ups against several top rivals.

The poll tested Democrats Clinton, Vice President Joe Biden, and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo individually against Republicans -- New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, and Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan, who ran as Mitt Romney’s vice-presidential pick in 2012 against President Barack Obama





Clinton was the only Democrat to beat all three Republicans, and Christie, who was not invited to next week’s conservative confab CPAC, showed the most strength for the GOP.

Clinton beats Christie, 45-37 percent, Ryan 50-38 percent, and Rubio by an even wider 50-34 percent.

By contrast, Biden would lose narrowly to Christie 43-40 percent. Biden, however, defeats Rubio 45-38 percent and Ryan 45-42 percent.

Cuomo -- son of ex-Gov. Mario Cuomo, who had been urged to run for president in 1988 and 1992 -- loses badly to neighboring state governor Christie, 45-28 percent. He also loses to Ryan, 42-37 percent and would tie with Rubio at 37 percent.

Clinton left her job as Obama’s secretary of state with sky-high favorability ratings -- 56 percent viewed her positively, while just 25 percent viewed her negatively.

Of course, if she were to throw her hat into the presidential arena, her image would likely take a hit, as partisans retreat to their corners. During the height of the Democratic primary in March 2008, for example, Clinton’s favorability was just 37 percent positive, 48 percent negative.



To: tejek who wrote (703078)3/7/2013 12:25:42 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1578704
 
Poor tejek doesn't like calling attention to Obama's killing of US citizens with no trial.




To: tejek who wrote (703078)3/7/2013 1:19:39 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1578704
 
Krauthammer on Paul Filibuster: 'Stroke of Political Genius'

Newsbusters.org ^ | 3/6/2013 | Noel Sheppard




To: tejek who wrote (703078)3/7/2013 1:22:37 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1578704
 
Did Black People Own Slaves? Yes -- by Henry Louis Gates Jr.

  • By: Henry Louis Gates Jr. : March 4, 2013
  • theroot.com

    Nicolas Augustin Metoyer of Louisiana owned 13 slaves in 1830. He and his 12 family members collectively owned 215 slaves.


    Editor's note: For those who are wondering about the retro title of this black history series, please take a moment to learn about historian Joel A. Rogers, author of the 1934 book 100 Amazing Facts About the Negro With Complete Proof, to whom these "amazing facts" are an homage.

    (The Root) -- 100 Amazing Facts About the Negro No. 21: Did black people own slaves? If so, why?

    One of the most vexing questions in African-American history is whether free African Americans themselves owned slaves. The short answer to this question, as you might suspect, is yes, of course; some free black people in this country bought and sold other black people, and did so at least since 1654, continuing to do so right through the Civil War. For me, the really fascinating questions about black slave-owning are how many black "masters" were involved, how many slaves did they own and why did they own slaves?

    The answers to these questions are complex, and historians have been arguing for some time over whether free blacks purchased family members as slaves in order to protect them -- motivated, on the one hand, by benevolence and philanthropy, as historian Carter G. Woodson put it, or whether, on the other hand, they purchased other black people "as an act of exploitation," primarily to exploit their free labor for profit, just as white slave owners did. The evidence shows that, unfortunately, both things are true. The great African-American historian, John Hope Franklin, states this clearly: "The majority of Negro owners of slaves had some personal interest in their property." But, he admits, "There were instances, however, in which free Negroes had a real economic interest in the institution of slavery and held slaves in order to improve their economic status."




    In a fascinating essay reviewing this controversy, R. Halliburton shows that free black people have owned slaves "in each of the thirteen original states and later in every state that countenanced slavery," at least since Anthony Johnson and his wife Mary went to court in Virginia in 1654 to obtain the services of their indentured servant, a black man, John Castor, for life.

    And for a time, free black people could even "own" the services of white indentured servants in Virginia as well. Free blacks owned slaves in Boston by 1724 and in Connecticut by 1783; by 1790, 48 black people in Maryland owned 143 slaves. One particularly notorious black Maryland farmer named Nat Butler "regularly purchased and sold Negroes for the Southern trade," Halliburton wrote.

    Perhaps the most insidious or desperate attempt to defend the right of black people to own slaves was the statement made on the eve of the Civil War by a group of free people of color in New Orleans, offering their services to the Confederacy, in part because they were fearful for their own enslavement: "The free colored population [native] of Louisiana … own slaves, and they are dearly attached to their native land … and they are ready to shed their blood for her defense. They have no sympathy for abolitionism; no love for the North, but they have plenty for Louisiana … They will fight for her in 1861 as they fought [to defend New Orleans from the British] in 1814-1815."

    These guys were, to put it bluntly, opportunists par excellence: As Noah Andre Trudeau and James G. Hollandsworth Jr. explain, once the war broke out, some of these same black men formed 14 companies of a militia composed of 440 men and were organized by the governor in May 1861 into "the Native Guards, Louisiana," swearing to fight to defend the Confederacy. Although given no combat role, the Guards -- reaching a peak of 1,000 volunteers -- became the first Civil War unit to appoint black officers.



    1 2 3 4 last »



    To: tejek who wrote (703078)3/7/2013 1:27:57 PM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 1578704
     
    Whittaker Chambers and Alger Hiss

    In late July 1948, the committee heard testimony from Elizabeth Bentley, an American who had been working as a Soviet agent in New York. Among those whom she named as communists were Harry Dexter White and Whittaker Chambers. The committee subpoenaed Chambers for early August 1948. Chambers, too, was a former Soviet spy, by then foreign desk editor of Time magazine. Chambers cited the names of more than a half dozen government officials including White as well as Alger Hiss (and Hiss's brother Donald). The majority of these former officials refused to answer committee questions, citing the Fifth Amendment. White denied the allegations and died of a heart attack a few days later. Alger Hiss also denied all charges. However, during his testimony, Hiss made a number of false statements for which he was later convicted of perjury and imprisoned.[19] The present-day House of Representatives website on HUAC states that "In the 1990s, Soviet archives conclusively revealed that Hiss had been a spy on the Kremlin's payroll."



    To: tejek who wrote (703078)3/7/2013 1:43:09 PM
    From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1578704
     
    Source: Preparations underway for Obama vacation on Martha's Vineyard


    Politico44 A Living Diary of the Obama Presidency ^ | 3/7/13 | DONOVAN SLACK