Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Identix (IDNX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David who wrote (5528)	12/4/1997 12:40:00 PM
From: marvin smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26039

Are we getting ready for a breakout?

To: David who wrote (5528)	12/4/1997 1:14:00 PM
From: flaget	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26039

Mr. David: Thanks for your reposte: I do not entirely agree, but thanks. I doubt that fac/rec systems would be good for cop surveillance as survie-ops are generally done from a long distance, taking in a whole street corner, not just one doorway. It seems that for court acceptable evidence purposes the fac/rec camera must be very close to the subject, as through the peephole in a speakeasy as it were, if that word is familiar. It seems also that a retail credit-card verify-situation is not a "one-to-many" search issue. All the merchant needs to know is whether the card-presenter has the same physical bio-algo as the one already imbedded in the card. It is a one-to-one question, not a one-to-many. For example,if my card says I am "23XD6" and my live fingerprint says I am not "23XD6" then my transaction might be voided. I am long IDX and have been for over 2 1/2 years. I am still profitable even after these last long months. I "ain't" in love with it and have severe criticisms of our management, but I remain long, cautiosly. Regards flaget