SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (703460)3/9/2013 2:13:17 AM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1575153
 
>> What a dumbass! Does no one have the nerve to tell him he has no talent?

Actually, the reviews are impressive. Art reviewers around the country are freaking the hell out -- not over his talent or lack of it, but trying to "interpret" what they mean. It is hilarious:

New York Times: “The two paintings could be said to depict the introverted self-absorption for which Mr. Bush is known. Perhaps, he is trying to cleanse himself in a more metaphorical way, seeking a kind of redemption from his less fortuitous decisions as president.”New York: “More impressive than the painting’s aesthetic quality is the soul-searching introspection evident in the scene. Bush, slightly hunched, is standing out of the water, staring off into the corner of the shower, as if contemplating past sins that can never be washed away, no matter how much soap you use and how hard you scrub.”American Prospect: “The vanity of an older man who has maintained a lanky frame is there—he paints his naked torso, finely shadowing those 66 year old back muscles with pride, still taut from years of brush-clearing and bill signing. And yet, he can’t seem to look at himself in the mirror. Nor can he escape himself it seems—the mirror’s reflection is relentless, inescapable. Whatever your take, it’s clear that there’s a lot more than just singing going on in that shower. Even in the quiet inner sanctum of the bathroom, where a man is just a man, George W. Bush cannot escape his past.”New Republic: “Consider the composition. The subject of the painting is not actually under the water. Physically, he stands back, reticent, his body still dry. In the shaving mirror, he watches from above, as if surveying the scene from an aircraft, a vaguely confused look on his face.”National Journal: “But it’s the paintings that have caught the imagination of the public and of the critics, some of whom profess to like the former president’s work even as they patronize it. It’s because a sensitive Bush, an artistic Bush, a man who paints himself nude and vulnerable, is not the Bush we thought we knew. Although, of course, he did marry a librarian who loves to read. So maybe we should have suspected an artistic temperament all along?”
You just have to love this crap. They don't know what to say. Artistically, it isn't really that bad for someone who is just dabbling.

FOR EXAMPLE:



Now, that's impressive. Or perhaps you prefer this:



If you prefer a famous rock artist:



And then there are the famous movie actors


Overall, I'd say GWB as well as any of these guys.




To: bentway who wrote (703460)3/9/2013 12:11:24 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1575153
 
What a dumbass! Does no one have the nerve to tell him he has no talent?

lol. They wouldn't tell him he didn't have the ability to be president so why would they tell him he can't paint.