SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WAR on Terror. Will it engulf the Entire Middle East? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: warren789 who wrote (29047)3/11/2013 11:31:03 AM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32591
 
UN report: Hamas killed BBC reporter's baby in Gaza -- not the Israelis as was reported worldwide

Another fabricated atrocity

Will the many, many mainstream media outlets that reported that Jihad Misharawi's son was killed by the Israelis run retractions and apologies? Don't hold your breath.

"UN Reports the Truth: Hamas Killed BBC Reporter's Baby in Gaza," by Chana Ya'ar for Israel National News, March 10 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

The United Nations has issued a report with unusual courage and accuracy that plainly tells the tale of Israel’s Pillar of Defense counter terror operation – and exposes the lies of Hamas, told to a grieving father and his BBC bureau chief.In what has become typical of international media, The Washington Post and a BBC bureau chief last November accused and convicted the Israel Defense Forces in a heartrending, angry piece without verifying their information after a fellow editor in Gaza lost his baby son in rocket fire that struck his home.

The front page photo of an Arab stringer for a world-class news network, clutching his dead baby son in his arms, tears running down his cheeks, became a powerful icon of the tragedy of the conflict.

It was used by Hamas as propaganda to blacken Israel’s name in the media and politically in the international arena as it fought to defend its southern population against Gaza’s missile fire.

But apparently very few questioned the source of the rocket fire – certainly not the grieving father, Jihad Misharawi, who at his son’s funeral blamed “the Jews” – nor did BBC Middle East bureau chief Paul Danahar, who came to Gaza to support his colleague, or The Washington Post, which printed the story, written by Max Fisher and "foreign staff", with photos, published on the front page.

Photos of the damaged home were duly posted, along with a photo of the little child, who is indeed beautiful, and the heartbreaking photo of a grieving father carrying what appears to be his dead son wrapped in shrouds.

“An Israeli round hit Misharawi’s four-room home in Gaza Wednesday, killing his son, according to BBC Middle East bureau chief Paul Danahar, who arrived in Gaza earlier that Thursday,” Fisher reported in his article along with the paper’s “foreign staff” on November 15. “Misharawi’s sister-in-law was also killed, and his brother wounded. Misharawi told Danahar that, when the round landed, there was no fighting in his residential neighborhood.

“We’re all one team in Gaza,” Danahar told me,” Fisher wrote, “saying that Misharawi is a BBC video and photo editor. After spending a ‘few hours’ with his grieving colleague, he wrote on Twitter, ‘Question asked here is: If Israel can kill a man riding on a moving motorbike (as they did last month), how did Jihad’s son get killed.”

Answer: Jihad’s son was killed by Hamas, according to independent investigators from the United Nations. He was murdered by the journalist’s own neighbors, the very men who purport to be his biggest protectors, who live in the surrounding buildings in the city where he lives.

According to the advanced version of its report released by the U.N. Human Rights Council released late last week, “On 14 November, a woman, her 11-month-old infant, and an 18-year-old adult in Al-Zaitoun were killed by what appeared to be a Palestinian rocket that fell short of Israel.”

A footnote to the section says the case was personally investigated by the U.N. OHCHR, and that investigators believe the attack emanated from Hamas.

The terrorist organization – as well as its allied terrorist groups, such as the Islamic Jihad – is well known for launching attacks against Israel from within residential areas in Gaza and maximizing the use of its human shields.

The U.N. document reveals Gaza terrorists fired more than 1,500 rockets at Israel between November 14-21, 2012. For the first time, a number of the missiles reached Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Six Israelis were killed, including four civilians, and 239 Israelis were wounded. Gaza terrorists readily admitted to aiming at civilian targets.

“While some projectiles were directed at military objectives, many, if not the vast majority of the Palestinian attacks on Israel constituted indiscriminate attacks,” noted the report. “Such attacks violate international humanitarian law".

"Most rockets fired by the armed groups did not seem to be directed at a specific military objective. Furthermore many Palestinian armed groups directly and indirectly indicated their determination to – and took responsibility for – attacks on Israeli civilians or large population centers in Israel. Such acts clearly violate international humanitarian law, namely the principle of distinction...

“Another issue of serious concern during the crisis was allegations related to rocket attacks launched by Palestinian armed groups from populated areas in Gaza...some of these rockets may have been launched from underground tunnels....eyewitnesses informed OHCHR that on two occasions rockets were launched from an area south of Palestine Stadium in Gaza City, about 100 meters from a residential area...OHCHR received first-hand information indicating that rockets were fired from areas close to civilian buildings in the east of Gaza City... about 300 meters from several residential houses.

Launching attacks from populated areas constitutes a violation of customary rules of international humanitarian law, i.e. the obligation to take all precautions to protect civilians. By having done so, the civilian population’s exposure to the inherent dangers of the military operations taking place around them was greatly heightened.

"The real questions should be, 'Will The Washington Post print a retraction in the same location as its captivating erroneous front page article? An apology? A new photo? How will BBC bureau chief Paul Danahar respond to this U.N. report, and how to correct the erroneous reports he may have disseminated?,'" Israeli veteran journalist and Middle East analyst Hana Levi Julian pointed out.

"Just a few years ago, a BBC bureau chief was kidnapped by a Gaza terrorist organization and held hostage for nearly five months, his life hanging in the balance. By a miracle, negotiators managed to free him and his life was spared," Julian noted.

"With terrorists breathing down this news organization's neck, scrutinizing the actions of each of its local reporters, can the BBC allow itself to report objectively in Gaza?"




To: warren789 who wrote (29047)3/11/2013 9:39:21 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 32591
 
The US dollar has lost 93% of its worth since 1903

And that's about 10% per every decade, right? Venezuela did 33% just a couple of weeks ago..

According to this chart, the Bolivar in 2001 was worth about USD $1.

tradingeconomics.com

It's now over SIX bolivars to every USD.. And that's just the official rate.. As that Businessweek article stated, on the black market it's 18 Bolivars to the USD...

So tell Mr. Math wizard.. what's the percentage loss in worth to those Venezuelans who held Bolivars in 2001?? Come on now.. Do the math...

So all Chavez did was monetize the country's debt.. and doing it on the backs of the fixed income folks who can't hustle their money out of the country.. THAT IS REALITY.. All within the past 10 years.. not 93 years..

Do you think it's been helpful to those poor Venezuelans who's meager savings have been devalued so badly that it takes 18 (22?) Bolivars to buy the same thing they could buy for 1 bolivar in 2001??

zerohedge.com

Btw, which country do you live in Warren? How much has YOUR country's currency devalued since 1903??

How asinine it is of the US to have been offshoring its manufacturing capacity and capability over the years to foreign countries thereby creating, as it were, an ever burgeoning massive unemployment at home! To be sure, not everything is well on the US homefront.
No sh*t!! China's cheap labor has been a boon to Walmart and the other discounters.. But that's what American's are demanding.. cheaper prices.. Our workers just don't want to work for the same wages as they do in China, AND NOW in Venezuela, where labor is also pretty cheap.. (drum roll please... ) THANKS TO THE DESTRUCTION OF THE BOLIVAR's VALUE..

Do you actually believe that an economy that imports 70% of it's raw materials, and/or finished products can avoid soaring price hikes when their currency is trading on the black market at 3x the official exchange rates?...

That should tell how the people ACTUALLY FEEL about Chavez.. They voted with their pocketbooks and have devalued his currency 3x more than he actually did.. Don't pay any mind what people say.. Pay attention to what they DO!!


Presumably, some of the books you were advised to shun like the plague include;

I prefer folks like Hernando De Soto, the Peruvian economist, to help explain the problem as to why certain countries fail to economically develop.. Suggest you read "The Mystery of Capital".. It's enlightening..

Like the colonial powers of a bygone era who often talked of the White Man's Burden (Christianising and Civilising the coloured peoples of the world but in actual fact they were appropriating those peoples' material wealth and resources),
Name for me any point in recorded history where there was a period that wasn't dominated by colonialism and empire building... Please.. If it wasn't European, it was Persian or Arab.. Or Mongol.. or Roman.. Or Chinese..

The only difference between European colonialism was that it didn't normally involve the gradual process of conquest via land.. We were sea goers.. There was no incrementalism involved.. We sailed to some foreign land, conquered the locals, and set up a colony.. And the United States was not the primary culprit.. We were too busy conquering the Native American's and Spanish Conquistadores, taking their land from them..

That's just the way things were in those days.. Empires were what tribal and state powers did.. The Europeans certainly didn't invent it.. And neither did the US.

It's like slavery.. we didn't invent it.. It was going on (and still is) in Africa and throughout the world for centuries. After all, who do you think sold those African into slavery to the White Man? Other African tribes, who were just going to kill the men who belonged to the tribes they had conquered.

Eventually the politics of victimization has to end. People need to stop blaming their plight on things that happened hundreds of years ago, and they need to look in the mirror to find the culprit. And the US, after WWII, was the primary driver for de-colonization around the world. Dozens of nations owe their independence to American pressure on the British and French to give up their global empires.

As you can see, I am not an uninformed person.
Hmm.. just educated beyond your intelligence, maybe?

Maybe you should take a different perspective, stop playing the blame game, and try and understand the cultural, economic, and political reasons that things are the way they are around the world. You can stop blaming the US, and I think the "zionist" card is definitely over-played as well.. They are all just convenient excuses for various people's around the world to justify why they haven't lived up to their aspirations.

The reality is that they live in cultures where corruption is actually tradition.. I have spent 12 months out of the past 17 months living in Indonesia and traveling through SE Asia.. Believe me.. we didn't invent corruption, nor did we invent exploitation..

Again.. read Hernando De Soto.. He provides a perspective that supports the saying.. "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for life".. (presuming they get off their @sses and actually go fishing, instead of blaming someone else.. )

Hawk