Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bart13 who wrote (99159)	3/15/2013 10:50:55 PM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220008

Mexican invaders and Ghetto Blasters: eliminating low-income rental subsidies and emergency homeless shelters, reducing unemployment benefits, squeezing federal aid for poor schools and cutting nutrition assistance for poor women and infants. Read more: sfgate.com Its better to be poor in a rich country, That is why people flock to those countries. A real economy supports the poorest as surpluses are employed to assist them. If country does not have a real economy, there are no surpluses the assist the poorest. Thus they fall by the side of the road. Dilma is supporting Brazilian poorest as the economy now can afford that. Poor Brazilian getting better. Poor persons living in a rich country start having the effects on tem as the cushion is removed.