Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : C-Cube -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rarebird who wrote (26129)	12/4/1997 4:41:00 PM
From: Maya	Respond to of 50808

Rarebird, Let Cube slide/break, but it is not due to the negative cash flow that you keep bringing up. Will you please respond to Robt's message first on the cash flow - accept that you wrongly used the 96 numbers? To: +Rarebird (26096 ) From: +robt justine Thursday, Dec 4 1997 7:44AM EST Reply # of 26136 <<But I also want to see prospective investors in Cube not get hurt or lose money.>> Thanks for taking the time to be concerned for me, Rare. <<The information on cash flow is not misinformation, but again comes from S@P's earnings guide, November 98>> It IS S&P earnings guide dated November 1997. I am looking at it right now. "Cash flow"= -1.93; Earnings= -2.15; Year=1996. The report is dated November, 1997. But it is clearly designated that the numbers you keep bringing up are from 1996, last year Again, thanks for your concern for the long position. But please find something else to scare me with.