SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Carolyn who wrote (63341)3/20/2013 10:06:15 AM
From: Peter Dierks1 Recommendation  Respond to of 71588
 
Ben Carson’s most surprising policy positions
Jamie Weinstein
11:04 PM 03/19/2013

Dr. Ben Carson is a conservative star on the rise, but at least one of his policy ideas might cause the Republican leadership to do a double-take. In an interview with The Daily Caller, Carson said he opposed the invasions of both Iraq and Afghanistan.

The famed neurosurgeon and rising conservative voice said he sent a letter to President George W. Bush sometime after the attacks of September 11, 20o1 and before the U.S. invaded Iraq in March 2003.

“I actually wrote President Bush a letter before the war started and I said, you know, what I would do is I would use the bully pulpit at this moment of great national unity and, very much in a Kennedy-esque type fashion, say within 10 years we’re going to become petroleum independent,” Carson told TheDC.

“And that would’ve been much more effective than going to war because, first of all, the moderate Arab states would’ve been terrified. And they would’ve handed over Osama Bin Laden and anybody else we wanted on a silver platter to keep us from doing that.”

“Most importantly,” he added, “the terrorists will be defunded, and that’s the way you get to them.”

The reluctance to attack Iraq might qualify as a mainstream position these days, at least outside of the Republican Party. More surprising, however, is Carson’s claim that he would not have gone to war in Afghanistan — an action that was generally viewed as an act of self-defense at the time. And on other issues, Carson is also carving out independent positions.

Carson has become a conservative favorite since his February speech critiquing some of President Obama’s health care and tax policies at the National Prayer Breakfast — with the commander-in-chief listening to him on the dais – though he has said he is an independent. Shortly after the February speech, Carson appeared as an honored guest on a special episode of Fox News’ “Hannity” and last weekend he gave a rousing address at the Conservative Political Action Conference.

Some have even suggested the sixty-one year old who rose from nothing to become one of America’s most celebrated doctors and a Presidential Medal of Freedom recipient should run for president in 2016. Carson, who announced over the weekend that he is retiring from his medical practice later this year, has said he would do so only if God compels him.

Despite the enthusiasm in certain conservative quarters, Carson has not articulated his position on a host of issues that matter to Republican voters, primarily because he has yet to be asked about them.

Carson told TheDC in an phone interview Tuesday that had he been president after the Sept. 11 attacks, he would have avoided an invasion of Afghanistan, given the country’s history.

“I personally would not have [gone to war in Afghanistan] because, you know, you’ve got to look at the history of Afghanistan,” he said. “You’ve got 300 tribal leaders throughout the country who have never been united in anything so who are you going to negotiate with? How are you going to achieve peace in a situation like that?”

Carson says he would have used an unspecified type of covert action to go after al-Qaida leader Osama Bin Laden and Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein instead.

“I would’ve used everything at our disposal, but not necessarily made public what I was doing,” he said.

“I would have certain goals, one of which was to get rid of Saddam. And I think there are a lot of ways that can be done. And then there are ways that you can infiltrate societies and take advantage of knowledge that is gained. One of our big problems, I think, is we go around broadcasting everything that we’re going to do. And we give our enemies a tremendous advantage when we do that. There’s absolutely no reason that we should be doing that.”

Don’t mistake Carson for an isolationist, however.

“As the pinnacle nation in the world, we play a critical role in the direction of the world,” he said. “I think we have to be active.”

Carson maintains this independent strain on domestic topics as well. On the topic of gay marriage, Carson said he doesn’t believe “anyone from any group has the right to redefine a major pillar of society.” But, he added, “any two consenting adults have the right to formalize a relationship between them.”

Carson says he believes in socio-economic affirmative action — what he calls “compassionate action” — not affirmative action “attached to any ethnicity.”

“You know we’ve always pulled for the underdog, but I don’t think the underdog has a particular ethnicity attached to it,” he said.

“If we’re talking about applying to Yale University and, you know, my son is applying and, you know, the son of coal miner who got killed in a mine, who’s been working since he was 12 to help support for the family, is applying, and they have similar academic records, I’m going to give the edge to the coal miner’s son because he’s had a much harder road, and that’s the way the program should work. It should not be attached to any ethnicity.”

On the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the country, Carson says he would ”of course allow [illegal immigrants] to have a pathway to citizenship. That’s the only humane and reasonable thing to do.”

He also said the U.S. should ”just look to our north” to figure out how to reform America’s immigration system.

“How does Canada do it and why don’t they have the same problems that we do?” he asked, rhetorically. “Because they have a very well formulated guest worker program. People come, seasonal workers come, as needed, and a lot are needed. They can come and they can go. They pay taxes. They’re registered. It seems like a perfectly reasonable solution. I’m not exactly sure why we have to make it a big political issue.”

On CNN Sunday, Carson said he was not a Republican but an independent. He explained to TheDC that he used to be a Democrat.

“I was a very strident Democrat, but then I felt that the party was leaving me behind,” he said.

“Because they used to believe a lot of the same things that I believe in terms of personal responsibility and they seem to have left that behind and that’s where I had to part company because, you know, I think that when you take the downtrodden and you kind of pat them on the head and say,’There, there you poor little thing, I’m going to give you this and this and this,’ I don’t think you’re doing them any favors. I think you’re actually keeping them in that subservient position. And I strongly disagree with that approach.”

Carson placed his exodus from the Democratic camp “toward the end of [Ronald] Reagan’s second term,” but conceded that he “thought there were some very good things about [Bill] Clinton.”

“He had the ability to be flexible,” Carson said.

Carson declined to say if he voted for Clinton.

“I don’t want to say whether I voted for him or not,” he said.

Carson is a devout Christian — a Seventh-Day Adventist, to be exact. Asked what books or philosophers outside the Bible have influenced his worldview, he said, “I don’t know that I would give a lot of credence, honestly, to anything outside of the Bible because I find myself in disagreement with just about everything at one level or another.”

He did, however, point to historical figures he found “inspiring,”

“Now in terms of people who have been inspiring, I would have to say that from our point of view, George Washington,” he said.

“I thought that both [Abraham] Lincoln and [Stephen] Douglas were extremely articulate in the way that they framed their arguments, particularly around slavery. And I am also a fan of [Alexis] De Tocqueville’s two volume set, only because he was very objective in the way he described what he saw.”

“And he concluded … the whole thing by saying,” Carson added, “‘America is great because America is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, she will cease to be great.’”

dailycaller.com



To: Carolyn who wrote (63341)3/23/2013 9:18:48 AM
From: greatplains_guy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 71588
 
Rand Paul, Ben Carson, Marco Rubio...lots of great men out there.

You have that right Carolyn. Obviously the leftist media has painted a target on each of them. They will try to destroy them as they have any credible conservative leader. I still remember the scandalous cartoon Max Headroom, which was aimed at discrediting the Great Ronald Reagan. They were shooting blanks against The Great Communicator.



To: Carolyn who wrote (63341)4/18/2013 2:46:58 AM
From: greatplains_guy2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Shooting of Ben Carson's Detroit student host underlines real gun violence issues
April 16, 2013 at 1:00 am
Henry Payne

On March 28, a senior at Detroit's Northwestern High School enthusiastically introduced Dr. Ben Carson to speak on "Humble Beginnings" — how Carson escaped the mean streets of Detroit to gain international prominence as a Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon. On April 11, Carson returned to northwest Detroit to give a talk at the Tabernacle Missionary Baptist Church.

In his remarks, Carson lamented that Detroit gun violence had claimed another victim: the very Northwestern student who had introduced him just two weeks before.

As the U.S. Senate embarks this week on another spasm of gun control legislation in response to the Newtown, Conn., mass shooting, the Northwestern victim (his name is being withheld by the school district) is a reminder that Sandy Hook is an anomaly — the overwhelming majority of homicides in America take place in cities like Detroit, affect young males and rarely get media headlines.

If Washington passes a federal background check for all gun sales, it will be largely symbolic. Not only would a background check not have prevented Adam Lanza from acquiring a gun (his mother owned the firearm), it would do little to address violence in inner cities awash with illegal guns and drugs. This week's White House-driven gun circus is politically calculated to embarrass the gun lobby, but attacking the root causes of gun violence means boldly tackling much stickier issues: drug legalization, police reform and single-parent families.

In the week following the Newtown massacre, there were more than a dozen gun homicides in Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore and St. Louis. In 2012, 52 people were slain for every 100,000 Detroiters. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, large cities account for two-thirds of gun-related deaths.

That is no coincidence as the illegal drug trade is concentrated in America's inner cities, bringing with it gangs, drive-by shootings and waves of illegal weapons. The young males, most of them with criminal records, who populate this underground economy don't acquire their guns at shops or gun shows where a background check would flag them.

Ending the drug war would starve this violent culture — just as the end of Prohibition did in the 1930s. But there are other, more politically palatable reforms to be made.

New York City, for example, has seen dramatic change in recent decades — from one of America's most violent cities at 30 killings per 100,000 population to just five today (in a city of 8 million people, that's 418 killings last year down from 2,245 in 1990). Mayor Michael Bloomberg is right to point to better gun licensing (works for car safety, too). But, say criminologists, gun law enforcement is a piece of a comprehensive law enforcement strategy.

"Gun policing in New York got much more effective as every kind of street policing got more effective," Franklin Zimring, author of "The City that Became Safe," tells the Associated Press.

New York implemented so-called "hot spot policing" that vigorously targeted high crime ZIP codes, built computerized crime-mapping systems, and enforced existing gun permit laws — including using controversial stop-and-frisk laws for gun-carry IDs. In short, New York doesn't distract itself over anomalies, but concentrates on the known bad guys — even as law-abiding Americans continue to buy guns in record numbers.

Breaking the culture of violence, say black leaders like Carson, includes slashing family-busting welfare dependency, and encouraging two-parent homes that help cut off Detroit's assembly-line of violent young males. Single-parenthood is not only the No. 1 cause of poverty — 80 percent of Detroit newborns are to fatherless homes — but also the leading indicator of young male school dropout, crime and illiteracy rates.

With leadership in the home, says Carson, young males learn personal responsibility. And with better leadership on gun violence, America can focus on real solutions to the mayhem that terminates so many humble beginnings in Detroit.

Henry Payne's column runs every Tuesday online. Payne is a Detroit News editorial writer and editorial cartoonist. He also is editor of The Detroit News Politics forum. Email him at ]

From The Detroit News: [url=http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130416/OPINION03/304160309/1008/opinion01/Ben-Carson-tragedy-underlines-futility-gun-control-solve-Detroit-violence]http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130416/OPINION03/304160309/1008/opinion01/Ben-Carson-tragedy-underlines-futility-gun-control-solve-Detroit-violence