SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (704891)3/19/2013 12:08:44 PM
From: FJB  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573927
 
That's a feature, not a bug. Democrats that voted for this crap are the only ones that will be surprised. You know, the low information voters.



To: i-node who wrote (704891)3/19/2013 12:40:59 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1573927
 
US Is Still Paying for Civil War

OTHER WARS COST $40B A YEAR IN COMPENSATION: REPORT

By Matt Cantor, Newser Staff
newser.com
Posted Mar 19, 2013 10:29 AM CDT

(NEWSER) – It's been 148 years, and the US is still paying relatives of Civil War veterans every month. Two surviving children of veterans receive $876 annually, and while that may amount to a paltry sum, the AP's analysis of the continuing costs of US wars turns up much heftier figure: $40 billion each year, which goes to vets and survivors from the Spanish-American War (yes, of 1898), World Wars I and II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the two Iraq campaigns, and the Afghanistan conflict. A breakdown of the numbers, and the fascinating tidbits that accompany them:

Vietnam War veterans and relatives receive some $22 billion per year, a figure that the AP points out is twice the FBI budget. That's in part because the US compensates vets with diabetes, based on an "uncertain link" to Agent Orange.

Meanwhile, the US is paying some $12 billion per year to Iraq, Afghanistan, and first Gulf war veterans and relatives. Some 45% of Iraq and Afghanistan vets have applied for compensation for injuries.Among other big costs: World War II, which costs some $5 billion per year. And in what could be a bad sign for later conflicts, compensation hit its peak in 1991, some 46 years after the war's end.WWI costs $20 million a year, which is doled out to 2,289 survivors. Interestingly, 47 of those are spouses under the age of 80, meaning they weren't born until years after the war ended. Many of those women were in their 20s and 30s when their aging spouses died in the 1960s and 1970s, and they've been drawing the monthly payments since.



To: i-node who wrote (704891)3/19/2013 1:55:46 PM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573927
 
So, I could see my privately purchased policy covering one person (me) go from $1200/mo to $2400/mo next year. Cost cutting, indeed.


You cherry pick and assume the worst like a banshee... (your policy costs you $1200/mo....for yourself only?...are you serious? )

Al

While insurers forecast instant premiums hikes starting next January, the overhaul also is expected to tame health care costs for many.

Starting next year, the law will require insurers to cover everyone who applies. That means health care costs could fall dramatically for people who have been unable to find coverage due to a chronic condition like diabetes or high blood pressure.

There also will be tax credits, or subsidies, given to people with incomes that fall within 400 percent of the federal poverty level. For 2013, 400 percent of the poverty level for all states except Alaska and Hawaii would be $94,200. These credits won't lower premiums, but they can ease the insurance bill depending on a person's income.

The credits should help the 20-something customers that insurers warn will see big premium hikes, said Linda Blumberg, an economist with the Health Policy Center of the Urban Institute, a nonpartisan policy research organization. She noted that people in that age range are more likely to be either working for an employer that doesn't offer coverage or earning low wages that would entitle them to a sizeable credit.

There are other changes that will benefit young and poor people. Some may qualify for coverage under the state-federal Medicaid program for the poor and disabled, which will expand in many states next year.
Additionally, people under age 30 who face big premium hikes will be able to buy plans that charge low premiums and just provide coverage for big or catastrophic costs. Those plans also will be available to people required to pay more than 8 percent of their income for coverage.

Plus, people who are age 26 and under are eligible to receive coverage under a parent's plan, thanks to another overhaul provision that already started.

In addition to those changes, insurers will have to compete for business on the exchanges, which could restrain price hikes, said Larry Levitt, a private health insurance expert with the Kaiser Family Foundation, which analyzes health policy issues. He noted, for instance, that some are already creating narrow networks of low-cost providers to help keep costs in check.

"Plans are very focused on trying to get these premiums down," he said.