Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (704965)	3/21/2013 7:09:54 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574046

Al, it's hard to say with hard figures whether ObamaCare will actually reduce health care costs overall: But Obama did promise to reduce health care premiums for a typical family by "up to $2,500/year." I think it's more important to focus on the trends than to dwell on the precision or lack thereof of the people selling it to the country. I think we can all agree that politicians say what they need to in order to sell their ideas. Al =================================================================== New Data Suggests Obamacare Is Actually Bending The Healthcare Cost Curve Barack Obama signing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act at the White House (Photo credit: Wikipedia) A new Congressional Budget Office report out last week has the healthcare world scratching its head over the possibility that Obamacare might—in part—be responsible for what is being described as a significant slowdown in the growth of healthcare costs in America. According to the report, hundreds of billions of dollars in federal spending for Medicare and Medicaid are being removed from government projections as federal healthcare spending is now expected to be full 15 percent less than what had been initially budgeted for 2012. The surprisingly low spending projections come as the growth in healthcare spending has hit a new low for the fourth consecutive year. To be sure, a big part of the decline in healthcare spending is the result of the recession’s impact on people’s ability to lay out cash on health related expenditures. Indeed, up until this point, most analysts have agreed that the poor economy was pretty much the sole cause for the improvement we have seen in containing the explosion of healthcare spending. Now, experts are beginning to recognize that the Affordable Care Act may, in fact, be contributing to the good news—a significant development as bending the cost curve was a primary goal of Obamacare. Douglas Elmendorf, Director of the CBO, noted that while much of the savings are the result of a loss of wealth due to the recession. But, for the first time, Elmendorf was willing to say that a ‘significant part’ of the savings are the result of structural change in how healthcare is now being delivered. While the new data suggests that some of the changes in how providers are paid for delivering healthcare began—and were having a positive impact—prior to passage of Obamacare, the ACA codifies these changes in payment procedures for physicians and hospitals, taking what now appears to be programs that are slowing the growth in costs and applying them to all providers throughout the nation. Importantly, the slowdown in the cost of care is happening in both the overall rate of spending andgovernment spending. Writes Annie Lowrey in the New York Times— “The slowdown has occurred in both government and overall health spending. From 2009 to 2011, total health spending grew at the lowest annual pace since the government started keeping records 52 years ago, a trend that seems to have continued last year. In the 2012 fiscal year, Medicare spending per beneficiary grew just 0.4 percent. The new Congressional Budget Office data said that overall Medicare outlays grew 3 percent in 2012, the slowest rate since 2000.” The multi-billion dollar question is whether this positive trend will continue as we have seen slowdowns in the past only to see the curve explode upwards after a pause. The answer to that question matters as Lowrey reports— “Slower cost growth would have ramifications far beyond the deficit. According to calculations by White House economists, slowing the annual growth rate of health care costs by 1.5 percentage points might increase economic output by 2 percent in 2020 and 8 percent in 2030. It might also lead to higher wages for workers and more room for productive investments in the budget.” While we can expect the Obamacare bashers to pour cold water on this good news, there is no denying that the law is paying some dividends in the critically important effort to bend the cost curve in healthcare delivery. Could this be enough to open people up to contemplating that there may just be other good news to come thanks to health care reform? forbes.com

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (704965)	3/21/2013 7:14:25 AM
From: FJB	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574046

IRS Admits Obamacare’s Cost is $20,000 Per Family by Matthew Staver \| Washington, DC \| LifeNews.com \| 2/3/13 irs.gov lifenews.com Participating in ObamaCare will cost the average American family at least $20,000 per year! The IRS (which is charged with enforcing the onerous penalties and fines of the President’s healthcare “reform” law) has finally released a cost analysis based on ObamaCare regulations showing that the cheapest healthcare plan in 2016 will cost average American families of four or five members $20,000 per year for the so-called “bronze plan.” CNSNews.com is reporting… “The annual national average bronze plan premium for a family of 5 (2 adults, 3 children) is $20,000,” the IRS statement says. “Under Obamacare, Americans will be required to buy health insurance or pay a penalty to the IRS.”