Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (220437)	3/25/2013 3:54:43 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542972

It's not hard to know epi. DNA testing is by the million now. <It's hard to know- but probably > And in a further spoiler for the theory you quoted, in the cases in which the natural father is not the purported father, for the most part the children are not raised by the purported father. The list of selection variables used by women is not my theory. I'm just quoting actual investigations by dinkum scientists. The theory you quoted is not science but women's magazine "science". Maybe women you know opt to have babies from big-jawed dummies, but according to actual research, for the most part women do not in fact opt to have babies with the dull. My experience and that of most males is that women are quite particular - as choosy as they can be, and it is not the bottom decile in male intelligence who get to be the fathers of the next generation. Hence the Flynn Effect. The peacock's tail is the equivalent of the human male brain. The selection process does a rapid forcing in the direction of intelligence. There is obvious value to women in having intelligent men fathering and looking after their children. The more intelligent the woman, the more likely she is to figure such things out. So it's a turbo-charged process. Mqurice