Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (705783)	3/25/2013 3:41:46 PM
From: joseffy	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578459

The Kennedy kids BENEFITED from their father's dealings his whole life with the mob. That's why Sam Giancana and Mayor Daley held up the votes in Cook county for a day and a half so that JFK could falsely "win" over Nixon.

To: puborectalis who wrote (705783)	3/25/2013 3:42:46 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Respond to of 1578459

oh but Ted kennedy was OK ? drowning a young girl and running away is fine in your book ...hmmm how about making waitress sandwiches, was that ok also, was it ok with the waitress ? And jack banging a 18 year old intern in the White House and telling her Teddy looks down in the dumps, give him a blow job, that was ok in your book also ? And jack had her blow other people. Geee what does NOW say about men in power positions and young females...oh wait they don't say it about democrats. the whole family is slime. They abused the people on Martha's Vineyard. I've got stories, people I know hung out with them. They would go to a restaurant in MV and get to the parking lot at 10:45 pm knowing it closed at 11 pm. they would go inside at 10:58 and stay there eating small amounts to 3-4 in the morning. The people working there knew they were dead if they said anything and so did the kennedy boys, on the way home they would laugh their asses off at the peasants. A friend of mine was with them. Funny everything you libs hate about the arrogant super rich is what the kennedys are all about, but since they give a meaningless BS song and dance about the poor every once in a while, you turn a blind eye

To: puborectalis who wrote (705783)	3/26/2013 7:07:46 AM
From: Brumar89	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578459

Coulter to Bloomberg: Sodas? What about bathhouses? Russ Vaughn Ann Coulter raised an excellent issue on Geraldo at Large when, in a debate with a liberal supporter of New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg's self-declared war on personal bad health habits, she asked in so many words, "Why doesn't he close down the gay bathhouses?" For those of you out here in flyover country who may be unfamiliar with bi-coastal sexual practices, gay bathhouses are gathering places for men who are seeking anonymous, promiscuous, and frequently public sex with like-minded men. Such facilities first became more widely known to unsophisticated provincials back in the eighties with the rise of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. As it turned out, these bathhouses were the primary incubators for HIV. Following that discovery, many of them closed down when fearful gays quit patronizing them and government health departments increased their oversight. Within the gay community there was even a term for the relationship between bathhouses and AIDS: the Bathhouse Phenomenon. Apparently, as treatment regimens for HIV infection became more efficacious, and a diagnosis of being HIV-positive was no longer a sentence of certain death, gay men began reverting to old habits, and the bathhouses returned in even greater numbers. A quick Google search shows fourteen operating in New York City, and that's only the ones willing to be advertised on that particular gay website. So, to get back to Ann's question, just why is Mayor Bloomberg so hell-bent on protecting his constituents from their bad sugar consumption habits and potential obesity and diabetes, while apparently allowing these bathhouses to operate openly? Why, indeed, when they are known to be incubators of the deadly HIV and many of their patrons to be carriers of not just that virus, but also many other sexually transmitted diseases that are of significant public concern? Just this past week, the NYC Health Department issued a warning about a potential meningitis epidemic where gay men and promiscuous sexual activities appear to be the vectors. So Ann's question is legitimate to ask of Bloomberg. It is neither anti-gay nor unfair. It is recognition of a simple truth: liberalism tends to target disfavored practices while ignoring others possibly more injurious, even though those ignored may result in grievous illness and even death for their favored liberal adherents. Mayor Bloomberg is a glaring example of such biased selection even at a critical time when the rate of infection of the dreaded HIV virus appears to be on the rise among gay men. Where is Nanny Bloomberg's stern admonition to those gay men whose behaviors spread deadly disease? Where's the ban on the bathhouses where such behaviors take place? Where's his concern for the costs of their very expensive, possibly lifelong treatments to the rest of us? An epidemic to concern us all is the growing rate of delusional hypocrisy among liberals. Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/03/coulter_to_bloomberg_sodas_what_about_bathhouses.html#ixzz2OdvBNUZy Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter \| AmericanThinker on Facebook