SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (705785)3/25/2013 3:34:13 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573682
 
>> Too many assumptions of the worst variety...par for the course. Look at the swiss system for instance...doesn't fit your model does it. Single payer, private insurance options. On the other hand it is the most expensive in Europe...so there you have it.

Yet, we know that private insurers in the US can finance health care more cost-effectively than either Medicare or Medicaid.

You can't compare systems from country-to-country. You just can't do it. There are too many variables, too many parameters, and too many fundamental differences to have any sensible outcome.

What you CAN do is modify the US system a little at a time to see how changes affect outcomes. Unfortunately, the nitwits in DC didn't do it that way and now we have a mess.



To: Alighieri who wrote (705785)3/25/2013 5:23:21 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573682
 
Al, Switzerland doesn't have single-payer. They just have an individual mandate.

And although Switzerland has like 99% coverage, they have a tough time controlling health care costs, and they still have the problem of uninsured residents, primarily immigrants and the poor.

No country has an ideal system of health care.

Tenchusatsu