To: epicure who wrote (220488 ) 3/25/2013 7:38:55 PM From: Maurice Winn Read Replies (1) | Respond to I read that. It didn't mention intelligence. It was not really "science". It was an interview and typical of story-telling "science". As proof that intelligence and my theory are false it didn't get past the first hurdle. The bit about the study said: <In the new study, researchers asked women who were at different points in their menstrual cycles (and who were not on the pill) to rate their own attractiveness. Then researchers presented them with image pairs representing "feminized" and "masculinized" versions of the same male body. The women were asked to choose the body they thought was most attractive for a short-term relationship and then again for a long-term relationship.Some of the women performed the experiment again at the opposite point in their cycle.considered themselves attractive .Hormones and Behavior , reveal that "preferences are not absolute," Little said. >en.wikipedia.org Working with Ian Deary , Paul Irwing , and Geoff Derr, he reported evidence for substantial gender differences in intelligence in the form of much larger variance amongst males than amongst females, with more boys and men scoring in both the extreme high range, and in the extreme low range > Women miss out on three years of brain development time which explains a lot though that fact is ignored nearly always [I have never seen it mentioned].
