Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockMan who wrote (41464)	12/4/1997 5:44:00 PM
From: Petz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Stockman, don't shoot the messenger (Kurlak) for Intel's problems. If you had listened to him when Intel was 95, you'd have some money left for Christmas presents, and not be so grumpy or afraid of AMD's new notebook chips. Petz

To: StockMan who wrote (41464)	12/4/1997 6:04:00 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Stockman, >>>I think Intel does that very well. In fact I think they give out more information than the dumb analysts can handle and therin lies the problem. <<< You miss my point. It's about managing your business, managing the future, managing analysts and Wall Street expectations. You have to have some ability to control these aspects of the business. Disseminating technical information is not what I'm talking about. Intel is great at managing it's business - if you look at the numbers, you would have to be a real wacko to disagree. Intel is great at managing it's future - Engel's dissertation explains this so even I can understand it. IMO, Intel is in complete control of their future destiny - for better or for worse. But, when it comes to controlling analysts and managing Wall Street expectations - I am shocked, shocked,shocked : Intel is a no show. Mary