SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GPS Info who wrote (99589)3/26/2013 11:13:14 PM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation  Respond to of 218000
 
Forests are quite annoying. Grassland is more pleasant. Tigers are easy to see too in open fields. And shoot. <start in NZ where it's safe, and work your way out from there. > 150-100 years ago, people worked hard to clear forests in NZ to grow grass. Some forests have been replanted and councils have a religion about native trees. Tree worship seems an odd religion but there have been all sorts of superstitions and religions, so that's just another.

Forests of fruit trees would be fine by me.

Mqurice



To: GPS Info who wrote (99589)3/27/2013 2:58:44 AM
From: average joe2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218000
 
I don't think that's true. Several different types of people could prevent that from happening, say, miners and oil men.
or Indians...

And by now we are about ready to reap the rewards of our forty-year policy of fire suppression, Smokey the Bear, all that. The Indians used to burn forest regularly, and lightning causes natural fires every summer. But when these fires are suppressed, the branches that drop to cover the ground make conditions for a very hot, low fire that sterilizes the soil. And in 1988, Yellowstone burned. All in all, 1.2 million acres were scorched, and 800,000 acres, one third of the park, burned.

Then, having killed the wolves, and having tried to sneak them back in, the park service officially brought the wolves back, and the local ranchers screamed. And on, and on.

As the story unfolds, it becomes impossible to overlook the cold truth that when it comes to managing 2.2 million acres of wilderness, nobody since the Indians has had the faintest idea how to do it. And nobody asked the Indians, because the Indians managed the land very intrusively. The Indians started fires, burned trees and grasses, hunted the large animals, elk and moose, to the edge of extinction. White men refused to follow that practice, and made things worse.

To solve that embarrassment, everybody pretended that the Indians had never altered the landscape. These “pioneer ecologists,” as Steward Udall called them, did not do anything to

manipulate the land. But now academic opinion is shifting again, and the wisdom of the Indian land management practices is being discovered anew. Whether we will follow their practices remains to be seen. Michael Crichton