SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (706680)3/30/2013 3:50:03 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Respond to of 1578494
 
"Romney was detailed and specific"

lol.......bull shit.!!



To: i-node who wrote (706680)3/30/2013 6:07:55 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1578494
 
>> It is a pretty crappy choice of language. If he has political aspirations he'll have to hone up his communication skills or he'll be in Akin-land real quick.

It was a crappy choice of language and that's precisely what Carson himself said when he apologized for the remark. But he also pointed out that he was in no way "equating" the behaviors, which is what teddy claimed.


Wingers always retract after making a racist or prejudiced, disparaging remark. Nothing has changed with Carson.

I don't think Carson can win if he runs (and I think he is running), because of his religion; in this country a person who speaks openly about his religion is no longer electable, and I think that is tragic. I'm not a very religious person myself; however, it is disturbing that the country does not allow religious freedom when it elects its presidents anymore.

This country is not a theocracy. Its something wingers can't seem to come to terms with.



To: i-node who wrote (706680)3/30/2013 8:58:50 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578494
 
"it is disturbing that the country does not allow religious freedom when it elects its presidents anymore."

What are the chances of an atheist being elected president......is that religious freedom?