SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RMF who wrote (706982)4/2/2013 7:50:47 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573885
 
Thats purely your imagination since I've never said anything of the sort.

Concealed carry or not, what you seem to be advocating is EVERYBODY having a gun and carrying it anyplace they want.

I do think everybody who isn't a felon or mental health risk and who WANTS a gun should be able to own some. As for carrying, I support concealed carry laws which don't equal everybody carrying a gun everywhere. I do think gun free zones are stupid though.

The Republicans don't even want universal background checks. What's wrong with finding out if somebody is a nut case or a felon BEFORE they are allowed to buy a gun?

We already have criminal background checks for licensed dealers. Republicans support adding mental health risks (people who've had 'danger to themselves or others' court orders passed on them). What Democrats want is onerous regulation that would ban or criminalize private sales, transfers, loans, etc etc. One of the Democratic bills would make it a crime to leave a gun home with another person and go on a trip ... that would be a 'transfer' that had to be reported. The same proposed bill would give someone 24 hours to report a lost or stolen gun. Democrats seem to plan to use gun control legislation to harass ordinary citizens.

To drive a car you have to go through some procedures, but you seem to think anybody that wants a an AR15 with a 30 round clip shouldn't have to do anything but come up with the cash.

Actually you can buy a car without knowing how to drive if you have the cash.



To: RMF who wrote (706982)4/2/2013 11:47:43 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573885
 
Utah Homeowner Pulls 9mm, Holds Burglar at Gunpoint Until Police Arrive

After being awakened by noises in his house at 4:30 a.m. on March 28, a St. George, Utah man retrieved his 9mm handgun, found a burglar, and held him at gunpoint till police arrived. Homeowner Eric Martin says the burglar tried to flee when he found him. But Martin tackled him, put the gun against his head, and warned him, "If you move, I will shoot you."

The burglar, George Keller, had apparently been going in and out of Marin's home as Martin slept that night, as there was a stack of things of the front yard the burglar had carried out.

Martin's girlfriend called 911 while Martin kept the gun pointed at Keller. When police arrived they said Martin "did a great job." Adding: "We are incredibly grateful for this homeowner and what he did. It was brave and it was a great conclusion to what could have potentially been a very bad situation."

breitbart.com

Every time a citizen defends themselves against a criminal, a Democrat (The Criminal Party) loses and a Republican wins.



To: RMF who wrote (706982)4/2/2013 6:33:23 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573885
 
BREAKING: Democrats Push Legislation to Require Purchase of Gun Insurance or Face $10,000 Fine
Posted by Jim Hoft on Tuesday, April 2, 2013, 10:53 AM






Congressional Democrats proposed legislation today to require gun owners to purchase insurance of face a $10,000 fine.
FOX News reported:

A New York Democratic lawmaker is behind a national push that would force gun owners to buy liability insurance or face a $10,000 fine.

The Firearm Risk Protection Act, pushed by Rep. Carolyn Maloney and seven co-sponsors, follows efforts at the state level to create the controversial new kind of insurance for gun owners.

“For too long, gun victims and society at large have borne the brunt of the costs of gun violence,” Maloney said in a written statement. “My bill would change that by shifting some of that cost back onto those who own the weapons.”

The likelihood, though, of Maloney’s bill gaining any traction is slim. Republicans control the House, and even states where Democrats have sizeable majorities have not approved the insurance idea.

Six states — California, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York and Pennsylvania — have all introduced gun liability insurance legislation over the past few months. None has produced any results.

In Illinois, the House rejected a measure 34-74 that would require people carrying concealed weapons to also carry $1 million in liability insurance.

Rep. Mahoney’s released this statement on the gun insurance legislation.

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and eight cosponsors have introduced the “Firearm Risk Protection Act” (H.R. 1369), the first bill to require liability insurance of gun buyers nationwide.

“For too long, gun victims and society at large have borne the brunt of the costs of gun violence. My bill would change that by shifting some of that cost back onto those who own the weapons,” Maloney said. “We have a long history of requiring insurance for high-risk products– and no one disputes that guns are dangerous. While many individual states are debating this issue now, it makes more sense for Congress to establish a national requirement to allow the insurance markets to begin to price the risks involved consistently nationwide.

“In the wake of tragedies such as Newtown, Aurora, and Tucson, our nation is searching for answers. While I support bans on assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines, improved background checks for gun buyers and defining straw purchases as a federal crime, a market-based approach such as this for legally purchased weapons is another common-sense way forward,” Maloney concluded.

H.R. 1369 requires gun buyers to have liability insurance coverage before being allowed to purchase a weapon and imposes a fine of $10,000 if an owner is found not to have the required coverage; service members and law enforcement officers are exempt from this insurance requirement.


thegatewaypundit.com



To: RMF who wrote (706982)4/5/2013 4:40:51 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573885
 
A Well Armed Family Is A Safe Family
Posted on April 4, 2013by stevengoddard
Obama is in Colorado today on his 2nd Amendment destruction tour. Meanwhile, responsible people in Colorado are protecting themselves from other criminals.

DENVER – An intruder who forced his way into the mountain home of a Colorado deputy district attorney was shot dead by either the prosecutor or her police officer husband, authorities said on Tuesday.

A spokeswoman for one of the agencies investigating the incident told Reuters that the prosecutor and her husband, himself a sheriff’s deputy, both fired at the intruder, but it is too early in the probe to know who fired the fatal shot.

Intruder killed while breaking into Colorado prosecutor’s home – U.S. News

stevengoddard.wordpress.com



To: RMF who wrote (706982)4/13/2013 11:52:47 AM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations  Respond to of 1573885
 
VIDEO: California Concealed Carry Citizen Captures a Serial Burglar at Gunpoint

Posted by Gateway Guest Blogger on Saturday, April 13, 2013, 1:02 AM

Guest Post by Mara Zebest

Another story in which a good guy with a gun stops the bad guys. Love celebrating these stories that prove the 2nd amendment is crucial to protecting property rights… whether the property is applied to our own life and safety of loved ones… or protecting a home or business.

[iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WdTE5ynKp6g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""][/iframe]

GunsSaveLives reports the following:

The owner of a business in Oroville, CA was fed up.

He had been robbed over a dozen times in the previous months.

Police had not been able to track down and capture the thief, despite surveillance camera footage showing one of the thefts happening.

The business owner, a concealed carry permit holder, decided to take action.

He camped out at his business and when he heard a noise, he lept into action, drawing his gun and holding the suspect at gunpoint until police arrived.

The suspect and another man were taken into custody in connection with the crime. At the suspect’s home police found some of the stolen merchandise.

This is another great example of a defensive gun use in which no shots were fired, no one was hurt and the bad guy ended up behind bars.

Read more at GSL or Sacramento CBS news.

thegatewaypundit.com

Every time a citizen successfully defends himself against a criminal, a Republican wins and a Democrat loses.



To: RMF who wrote (706982)4/15/2013 8:10:53 AM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573885
 
80 year old with gun fights off 5 armed robbers

Via MLive:

FLINT, MI — An 80-year-old Flint man fired two shots at five male teenagers attempting to rob him Thursday, April 11 in the driveway of his Helber Street home.

The homeowner called police around 9:45 p.m. to the home and told officers he’d fired two shots at the suspects, who had guns, in self defense, according to a police report.

All the suspects fled eastbound from the home towards Ballenger Highway. The homeowner thought he may have shot one of the suspects, but no shooting victim was found by police.

The investigative bureau was called to the scene for evidence collection and photographs. No arrests have been made in the case.

weaselzippers.us



To: RMF who wrote (706982)4/20/2013 12:37:48 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573885
 
**Warning graphic** Guest OpEd: “Don’t disarm me with your vote”


By Kimberly Weeks

Gun control. It’s pretty broad topic and no matter who you are, you’ve probably heard a lot about it lately, especially if you live in Colorado, the epicenter of the national gun control debate.

Fear of firearms keeps most of my college-aged peers from owning or carrying a gun. Going into my junior year at the University of Northern Colorado, I was one of them. I had grown up around my dad and brother’s shotguns and hunting rifles, but I didn’t believe I needed a weapon to defend myself. The very idea of carrying a handgun made me uncomfortable. Nothing would ever happen to me in Greeley, Colorado.

Then, everything changed in the early hours of a mid-May morning. I was sleeping in my college-area apartment when a stranger broke in through a closed window. He snuck into my bedroom. I awoke to a man covering my face with a shirt and didn’t stop for the next two hours as he raped me. I had no choice. I didn’t scream, I didn’t cry, I just prepared for this man to kill me.

During the unbearable hours of my attack, I was painfully aware of what was happening. I wish I could have shut down – but I didn’t. I started doing whatever I could do to survive. I was fighting for my life.

During the assault, I lied and told my attacker I had herpes, which did not nothing to deter him. I told him I was claustrophobic, hoping he would move the shirt just enough so I could identify him later – if I survived. I asked to use the restroom saying I might wet myself, but he repeatedly denied my requests.

I was doing everything I could to escape – doing everything I could to stop the horrific violence that was being forced upon me. I did everything I could – and I prayed it would be enough.

Time was running out, so despite the pain, anger, and fear that was coursing through my body, I tried one more thing: I started talking and kept him engaged in conversation for the next hour as I watched the sun rise through my bedroom window.

Others that could help were so close, yet so very far away. No one else knew what was happening to me. It was lonely and terrifying.

I convinced my rapist that I would not report his actions, that I was too embarrassed, and I even told him that I forgave him. I told him everyone makes mistakes. When he asked if he could get a drink of water from my kitchen, I directed him to the wrong cabinet, hoping he would leave fingerprints behind. When he left to get a drink, I was alone in my bedroom. I frantically glanced around and saw my cell phone, a knife, a hammer, and other various tools sitting on my bookcase headboard from unpacking the night before. I knew I could not physically overpower him with any of those objects if he came back.

After what felt like an eternity, I saw something that I never thought I’d live to see – he walked out the front door.

I had survived.

I immediately called 9-1-1 multiple times over a 16 minute period. The dispatcher had a hard time telling officers where to respond because my call would drop repeatedly. They did everything they could to get to me quickly, but it was not quick enough. He had already raped me and was gone.

I will never know if I would have been able to stop my rape if I had owned a firearm. I can tell you that any fear I had of guns evaporated as soon as I got a second chance at living my life. Had I been armed, I very well could have changed my circumstances and possibly prevented another attack on myself or the next victim.

This man was capable of breaking into my apartment and raping me, and in the half-second I saw into his eyes, I knew he could do much worse. My case is atypical because three weeks after my assault, my rapist was caught by police at an apartment complex just half a mile from mine, picking out his next victim. Ronnie Pieros was preparing to attack again, but to what extent? Would the next woman have lived to report her crime?

I firmly believe in Colorado’s Victim’s Rights Amendment – a law that affords victims of crimes to be heard present, and informed throughout the entire criminal justice process. It helped me through the most difficult time of my life, and I truly feel like the Greeley Police Department and the Weld County District Attorney’s Office were on my side. They did everything in their power to make sure I had a voice.

In front of the Senate State Affairs Committee on Monday, victims and law enforcement alike plead with the legislators not to pass HB 13-1226 – a measure that will ban concealed carry on college campuses. Monday evening, I realized how quickly, and how thoughtlessly, a small group of legislators put prior victim rights groups’ and legislators’ work at risk.

Victims of sexual assault in Colorado were silenced by the committee’s vote, but that’s not all. Now, we are now one step closer to being disarmed on our college campuses – on and near the very places we were sexually assaulted.

Every election season, we see Democratic candidates tout victims and women as a priority. But what happens after the election? Are we still significant?

It seems to me that candidates use this pandering technique solely get the votes they need. After the election, sitting comfortably in their chairs at the Capitol, the voting demographic they relied so heavily on is no longer the priority they once claimed. Some may say it’s unfair for me to make this assumption. But, earlier this week I sat directly in front of the Colorado Senate Committee telling them and a gallery of strangers, as well as media, the story of my vicious rape.

I plead with them not to strip me of my rights to carry the weapon I am licensed to carry on my college campus. The three Democratic Senators chose to ignore my plea. The very people that treated me like a priority when they needed my vote, voted against me when I needed theirs.

I ask – no, I beg – each Colorado Senator to stop ignoring the voices of citizens like me. Don’t re-victimize me with your legislation.

Please, Colorado, don’t disarm me with your vote.

revealingpolitics.com



To: RMF who wrote (706982)4/20/2013 1:19:07 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573885
 
Gun control and crime:

Bookworm on Apr 17 2013 at 10:37 am | Filed under: Second Amendment

From John Lott, describing what happened in Washington, D.C. when the Supreme Court decided District of Columbia v. Heller, reversing D.C.’s draconian anti-gun laws:

When the Heller case was decided, Washington’s Mayor Adrian Fenty warned: “More handguns in the District of Columbia will only lead to more handgun violence.” Knowing that Chicago’s gun laws would soon face a similar legal challenge, Mayor Richard Daley was particularly vocal. The day that the Heller decision was handed down, Daley said that he and other mayors across the country were “outraged” by the decision and he predicted more deaths along with Wild West-style shootouts. Daley warned that people “are going to take a gun and they are going to end their lives in a family dispute.”

But Armageddon never arrived. Quite the contrary, murders in Washington plummeted by an astounding 25 percent in 2009, dropping from 186 murders in 2008 to 140. That translates to a murder rate that is now down to 23.5 per 100,000 people, Washinton’s lowest since 1967. While other cities have also fared well over the last year, D.C.’s drop was several times greater than that for other similar sized cities. According to preliminary estimates by the FBI, nationwide murders fell by a relatively more modest 10 percent last year and by about 8 percent in other similarly sized cities of half a million to one million people (D.C.’s population count is at about 590,000).

From the New York Post, describing what’s been happening in Manhattan since New York State enacted its draconian anti-gun law:

Some of Manhattan’s wealthiest neighborhoods are exploding in a wave of violent crime that hearkens back to the bad old days when people feared going out at night, according to NYPD data obtained by The Post.

Chelsea, Gramercy Park, TriBeCa, SoHo and Midtown South all posted a frightening rise in rapes in the first three months of 2013 compared with the same period in 2012. Felony assaults in the usually peaceful West Village nearly tripled, the new crime statistics show.

Greenwich Village’s 6th Precinct tied the Rockaways’ grimy 100th Precinct for the city’s biggest year-to-date overall crime spike.

A graphic tells the story:



I wouldn’t presume to draw any conclusions from these two sets of data. I’ll leave you all to draw your own conclusions.

bookwormroom.com