SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Merck -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bruce Russell who wrote (437)12/4/1997 11:50:00 PM
From: RavBruce  Respond to of 1580
 
Sure, the ability to get a piece of Prozac's sales have a lot
of people looking at Merck. But, management did say in
a press release or conference call that they are sure they
will make next year's concensus figures. Since I do not trade
Merck(I only own a ton of it and do not plan to sell since my
children will go to college on it just as I did after a 200
share investment turned into 5000 shares over time)I usually
ignore earnings forecasts, etc. I realize that many institutional
investors follow these things carefully as do traders. That
may explain some of the jump. It still has not reached last year's
high although we are within a few points.
$2,000,000,000+ of R and D means we have lots more in store over
the next few years. If you own Merck for the short-term, you
may be concerned that some drugs are going off patent. I am not
sure why you would buy Merck only to trade it.
That's enough rambling for me,
Bruce



To: Bruce Russell who wrote (437)12/5/1997 12:33:00 AM
From: LTK007  Respond to of 1580
 
Thanks Bruce,and you are obviously extremely knowledgeable regards
Merck,and I can see why there is much reason to believe Merck will have
a continued dynamic and profitable future. Maxfield G



To: Bruce Russell who wrote (437)1/20/1998 7:04:00 PM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580
 
Bruce I would like to hear your comments on today's action. thanks John