SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (707540)4/5/2013 2:38:54 PM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1572529
 
>> Keeping Americans alive and healthy should be a higher priority than decreasing the deficit.

Right. After all, it isn't OUR money. It is our kids.

If this concept isn't morally bankrupt I just don't know what is.



To: SilentZ who wrote (707540)4/5/2013 6:31:50 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572529
 
Z,
Keeping Americans alive and healthy should be a higher priority than decreasing the deficit.
But here you are claiming that reducing the deficit takes time. Well yeah, it takes time when you place it lower on your list of priorities.

It all depends on what other priorities you have. Hence your silly "good deficit spending" vs. "bad deficit spending" statement. "Good deficit spending" includes ObamaCare, while "bad deficit spending" includes the war on terrorism.

Either way, the deficit will continue to balloon until it becomes unsustainable. This has been happening for the past several decades. Even the time when the budget was balanced was due to a dot-com bubble.

Tenchusatsu



To: SilentZ who wrote (707540)4/6/2013 10:54:47 PM
From: steve harris1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572529
 
The deficit is not decreasing just because Obama says it is.

Take another drink of kool-aid. But don't use a 32oz cup!

Message 28820319