Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ed who wrote (10176)	12/4/1997 9:10:00 PM
From: hpeace	Respond to of 97611

ed, it's not worth arguing ON ANY THREAD WHETHER AMD OR CYRX IS BETTER or whether it's 1.8 v or 3.3 volts or whatever. it's a waste of time / evey amd and cyrx chip made is sold.. I think all the intel chips are sold out too.

To: ed who wrote (10176)	12/4/1997 9:13:00 PM
From: StockMan	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 97611

Ed, Re -- AMD vs Intel chips.. Nobody is arguing about the merits of AMD vs Intel chips. CPQ's use of these chips is sub-1000 pc's at the end of life of that particular generation speaks for itself. Furthermore, AMD's chips which CPQ is palming off, has not had the wide exposure and maturity of use in the marketplace which pentium's do. Thus the point that CPQ's "sub-1000 pc's" are of lower quality than DELL's "sub-1000" pcs. Stockman