SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (708391)4/10/2013 5:26:32 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1585831
 
The New Black Panthers’ Unpunished Threats
....................................................................

By John Fund April 13, 2012
nationalreview.com


Holder’s Justice Department has taken a pass on the New Black Panther Party in the past.
In 2009, it inherited from the outgoing Bush administration a civil-rights lawsuit against the Party and three of its members for showing up armed outside a Philadelphia polling place in 2008 and shouting racial threats at voters. Bartle Bull, a former civil-rights lawyer who had been arrested in the South in the 1960s and later went on to become publisher of the liberal Village Voice, actually witnessed the intimidation and reported the Panthers’ actions to Justice. When the defendants failed to answer Justice’s lawsuit, a federal court in Philadelphia entered a default judgment against them. The Holder Justice Department responded by snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, suddenly dropping the charges against the Panthers and two defendants. The third defendant was merely barred from displaying a weapon near a Philadelphia polling place for the next three years. The bizarre decision prompted congressional outcries and a formal investigation by the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, which sent a letter to Justice in August 2009 saying, “We believe the Department’s defense of its actions thus far undermines respect for rule of law.” The Commission later issued a harshly condemnatory report of Justice’s behavior in the case. Could Justice’s leniency encourage the Panthers to think they can act with impunity in the future?

Bartle Bull says he is very concerned that Justice is practicing a double standard when it comes to enforcing civil-rights laws. “When he took office, Attorney General Holder stated that America was a ‘nation of cowards’ when it comes to race,” he told me in 2010. “But who are today’s ‘cowards’ on race? This kind of double standard is not what Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy stood for.”



To: Alighieri who wrote (708391)4/10/2013 5:48:09 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1585831
 
>>> That's just one example...

Not a very good one. Two guys who were essentially kicked out of the GOP, one an apparent criminal, are accusing GOP members of voter suppression.

The Republican governor of FLA is a criminal. No doubt about that. But this is hardly evidence of "systematic voter suppression."

In particular, the guy who claims the crime occurred conveniently didn't report it at the time -- only after he was ousted. That's not compelling evidence.

The argument that cutting the window for absentee voting somehow is voter suppression would only hold water anyway if the 14 day window proved insufficient. That's a pretty tough argument to make unless the lines were long during the 14 day period, and I've not heard that.

This just looks like typical party politics. Did they mention that on MSNBC?