SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Solon who wrote (35159)4/12/2013 12:23:47 AM
From: average joe1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 69300
 
Reluctant Irishman who became the high priest of satire Friday, April 12, 2013

When Jonathan Swift was appointed Dean of St Patrick’s Cathedral exactly 300 years ago, he wasn’t that impressed. Robert Hume explains why.



THREE hundred years ago this month, Jonathan Swift, later famous for his novel Gulliver’s Travels, was appointed 45th dean of St Patrick’s Cathedral, in his native Dublin.

Swift had impressive academic qualifications, including a doctorate in theology, but had never wanted to be a dean. He had only entered the Church in Ireland out of desperation, fed up with his employer in England, William Temple, fobbing him off with promises of a better job.

Swift was almost 27 when he secured his first post, at Kilroot near Carrickfergus. His salary was £100 per annum and he was miserable and isolated. “Growing weary in a few months,” Swift said, and he returned to England and became chaplain to the Earl of Berkeley.

Keeping an eye out for a more prosperous living, he began work on the satire A Tale of a Tub, in which he poured contempt on the beliefs of the Roman Catholic Church, particularly the doctrine of transubstantiation, and the practice of selling worthless pardons. Swift’s Catholic priest, who expected to be addressed as ‘My Lord Peter,’ had “an abominable faculty of telling huge palpable lies upon all occasions”, sold a magic pickle called ‘pimperlim-pimp’, and claimed he owned a cow whose milk would fill 3,000 churches.

In Swift’s opinion, the Puritans were little better — they destroyed sacred statues, and were “mad with spleen, and spite, and contradiction”.

Many people believed that Swift was attacking Christianity, rather than religious abuses. Either way, this was damaging for a young churchman intent on progressing through the ranks of the Anglican Church.

Swift did not find better-paying employment in England, so returned to Ireland in 1699, to become minister of Laracor in Co Meath. That he was simultaneously given the prebendary of St Patrick’s Cathedral did nothing to console him. He felt he had been sent to a shabby garrison on an unimportant frontier of the Church, and his pride was wounded.

With a congregation of 15 people, Swift had plenty of time to write and to tend to his garden. “His attitude towards his little acre of ground,” wrote his biographer Louis A Landa, “was more that of the gentleman bent on improving his estate than that of a priest concerned with the cure of souls”.

Although Swift now received £250 per annum, he paid a curate to preach sermons, having gone to live 20 miles away in Dublin Castle. There, he enjoyed the life of a bachelor, becoming renowned for his relationships with much younger women — Jane Waring, Esther Johnson and Esther Vanhomrigh.

Even then, frequent returns were made to London, so that he could hobnob with the great and powerful, and enjoy the company of authors such as John Arbuthnot, Alexander Pope and John Gay, who “put a new spirit into one.”

All the while, Swift was keen to acquire a deanery in England — one with a good income, such as Wells, Ely or Lichfield. But he was to be sorely disappointed. Preferment was at the disposal of Queen Anne, who deeply resented his satirical remarks on the Church.

Eventually, in April, 1713, he was offered the deanery of St Patrick’s in Dublin, which was in the gift of his friend, the Duke of Ormonde. Commenting on Swift’s promotion, William King, Archbishop of Dublin, said: “A dean could do less mischief than a bishop.”

For Swift, the deanery was a “safety net”, since his hopes of something better in England had come to nothing. The drawback was that it meant living in exile: “I am condemned to live again in Ireland … I cannot think nor write in this country”. He was “like a rat in a hole”, said his biographer, Leslie Stephen.

Dubliners coldly received Swift on the day of his installation, in June 1713. They shouted abuse in the street and posted notes on the cathedral door, taunting him for his criticism of the Church: “I was horribly melancholy while they were installing me, but it begins to wear off, and change to dullness.”

Swift could not wait to return to London that September, where he restored his contacts with politicians and poets.

Periods of absence by the higher clergy were by no means unusual at this time. Thomas Hackett, the Bishop of Down and Connor, was facetiously known as the ‘Bishop of Hammersmith’, because of his prolonged residence in the metropolis.

Swift visited London for the last time in 1727.

Thereafter he stayed in Ireland, where he seems to have adjusted to his role, heading the chapter of canons and taking charge of the services in St Patrick’s Cathedral, where he is buried.

However, Swift’s fame does not rest on his career in the Church, but on his accomplishments as a writer; not on his being a minister in this world, but on his being creator of fabulous new worlds of tiny people and giants.

irishexaminer.com



To: Solon who wrote (35159)4/12/2013 1:04:12 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 69300
 
The Lucrative Business Driving Congo's Witchcraft Courts



A file photo of a Mwami - (Kwibego) By Rodrigue Mangwa

SYFIA INTERNATIONAL/Worldcrunch

LEMERA - One woman now lives with her daughter in a densely populated neighborhood of the city of Bukavu, in eastern Congo. Six months ago, she had been sentenced to permanent exile from her native village of Lemera, in the South Kivu province, after a tribal court tried and convicted her of using witchcraft to kill her neighbor’s three children. .

Another woman from the same village was also convicted of using witchcraft to kill her husband’s concubine, exiled as well by this tribal court, called a Kihango.

In the Uvira highlands, the Bafuliru tribe holds Kihango court three or four times a month. Men and women who are accused of practicing witchcraft are brought before the court to be tried. When a person is found guilty of being a witch, the typical sentence is forced exile, and at least three weeks doing forced labor for the Mwami – the tribal chief.

“The person must leave the community immediately. This saves them from being lynched,” explains tribal elder Edmond Simba.

In this remote Congolese region, many people still believe that sickness, death or accidents do not “just happen” – they are caused by individuals, that must be identified and neutralized. This is done through a tribal justice system based on traditional customs and superstition.

To detect signs of witchcraft, the “judge” uses a nylon thread that is “extraordinary and resistant,” explained the tribal elders that we spoke to. The thread is put on a metal plate, which is heated with fire. If the thread breaks, the person on trial is a witch.

Out of the three tribes living in the Uvira highlands, only the Bafuliru people still use Kihango trials, which have been denounced by human rights activists.

The trials were banned in 1994 by the Bafuliru's Mwami, only to be resurrected in 2009, after the Mwami declared that it was a tradition that should be upheld. Going against tradition, he said, would be a serious offense. Even though many elders were against it, they approved the chief’s decision, for fear of losing their position in the tribe.

The neighboring tribe, the Bavira people, banned the practice in 2008. The Kihango trials were replaced by a new judicial process, which their Mwami trusted to deal with local disputes.

A lucrative business

It should be noted that the witchcraft trials are not free, and are an important source of revenue for the tribal chief. Before the dispute can be brought to the court, each party has to pay a mandatory fee of $200 – the price of a cow – whether they can afford it or not.

The headmaster of a primary school situated in Rubanga, 10 kilometers from the village of Lemera, says the witchcraft trials are just a way to exploit the local poor farmers in order to generate revenue for the tribal chief. “It would be naïve to think this is a real test of witchcraft. The tribal judges, who are pawns of the Mwami, are bribed to hand out false verdicts,” he says.

In August 2012, one of the judges admitted that he faked the result of the nylon test so that the woman on trial, the granddaughter of a friend, could be spared.

Vincent Lindalo, a local human rights activist, wants to encourage locals to denounce the trials. The villagers who are found guilty – mostly women – are forced to leave their villages to go live in places they barely know.

"Because they are ignorant of the judicial system and are poor, they believe it is impossible to win a trial against a tribal chief,” says Lindalo. “Many people believe the chief is untouchable, because of his position, or that their ancestors’ wrath will fall on them if they accuse the chief of wrongdoing.”

Read the article in the original language.

worldcrunch.com