To: Real Man who wrote (51087 ) 4/12/2013 2:46:13 PM From: ggersh Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 71463 They do this cause they can.... jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com 12 April 2013 Today's Gold Smackdown Portrayed on a June Futures Chart, 5 Minute Intervals Why would the government turn a blind eye to this? Well, in addition to allowing your cronies to make boatloads of money by gaming the markets, there is a not so subtle message wrapped within this chart from the financial engineers of the current banking system. "One of the central facts about modern America is that everything is political; on the right, in particular, people choose their views about everything, from environmental science to gun safety, to suit their political prejudices. And the remarkable recent rise of “goldbuggism,” in the teeth of all the evidence, shows that this politicization can influence investments as well as voting. What do I mean by goldbuggism? Not the notion that buying gold sometimes makes sense. Gold has been a very good investment since the early 2000s, and it’s probably not all bubble. One way to think about this is that gold is like a very long-term bond that’s protected from inflation; and actual long-term inflation-protected bonds have also seen big price increases, reflecting a general perception that there aren’t enough alternative good investments. No, being a goldbug means asserting that gold offers unique security in troubled times; it also means asserting that all would be well if we abolished the Federal Reserve and returned to the good old gold standard, in which the value of the dollar was fixed in terms of gold and that was that. And both forms of goldbuggism soared after 2008." Paul Krugman, Lust for Gold You see, gold is not an investment decision, it is a 'lust.' And since it does what Krugman does not wish it to do, it is irrational. That is the common thread I see among modern monetary theorists. The weakness in their theories always seem to turn to brute forces when their schemes get into trouble based on some inherent weakness that makes them unstable. That certainly is the picture in Europe. Other than that, Krugman shows once again he knows little about money and even less about trading in actual markets. He is an old school liberal statist I am afraid, that only pays occasional lip service to reform. Here is a piece I wrote some time ago about the 38 Year Cycle in Monetary History Here is a detailed picture of the gold trading on the Comex today. You can look at it and judge for yourself. There was no news to provoke this kind of a massive sell off in a quiet market and on heavy volume.