Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: simplicity who wrote (709125)	4/14/2013 2:39:18 PM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 1578203

If that lady watches Opera Winfry she is a retard to start with.

To: simplicity who wrote (709125)	4/14/2013 2:41:30 PM
From: joseffy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578203

The US public gets its "facts" from Opera Winfry, David Letterman Jon Stewart and other late night comedians.

To: simplicity who wrote (709125)	4/14/2013 2:44:27 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1578203

(2) the details about Obama's abortion views and policies, with particular emphasis on his lone negative vote on the BAIPA. The BAIPA was passed by the Senate in 2002 by unanimous vote. link Obama did not enter the US Senate until 2005.

To: simplicity who wrote (709125)	4/14/2013 2:45:51 PM
From: joseffy	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1578203

with sufficient diplomacy so as to keep her interested in the topic: (1) Oprah Winfrey is not the place to look for unbiased political opinion ... or political opinion at all, and (2) the details about Obama's abortion views and policies, with particular emphasis on his lone negative vote on the BAIPA. I would have told her (1) You are a retard, and (2) Obama is a piece of ****.

To: simplicity who wrote (709125)	4/14/2013 2:46:48 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578203

>> I am not saying that people should vote on the basis of one issue, but I am saying that a man who would take a stand against preventing what Kermit Gosnell has done ... and who would proudly be the only person who did so ... does not deserve to hold any political office, let alone that of President of the United States. At the very least, Americans deserve to know that he held that position. It is astonishing to me that the details of his support for that legislation never made the media. None of it. Very few people know of it. After Kirsten Powers' piece last week, the media is rushing to "cover" the Gosnell case. WaPo admits they made a mistake by not covering it. As far as I'm concerned, they're not "covering" it if they don't refer to the Obama vote. And Fox won't even touch that. It is not only relevant, it is substantial.