To: Mimbari who wrote (11890 ) 4/17/2013 1:31:46 PM From: travisnye Respond to Hey Mimbari, I seems you and I have differing opinions. If graph trends are thought moot ahead of your specified standards, why do companies establish themselves as Chart providers, for profit, offering me access to them? Why include so much information about the record established by a company, volume low or high, income positive, negative or non existent, and make them available to anyone interested? What is the point? How is a company's (positive) income the standard, after which relevance begins? Why is there a particular level of volume required to make trading suddenly appropriate for graphing? What if after making money, a company looses money? Is it then resumed to be once more worthless to graph? Why then, is it useless, before a company makes money, to use its plotted values as a pre-profit reference to assess its graphic data positions? Isn't a particular day's volume relative to another particular day's volume relevant or interesting? Wouldn't knowing the difference be of interest and perhaps of interpretive consequence? Day over day, week over week, these changes happen. I wouldn't want to memorize them. I reference a graph. If a trend doesn't interest you, is it's worth to another who's skills may make analysis of something real as a plotted trend's direction applicable, interpretable, perhaps obvious and of value to an interested party? Maybe not.projection of these graphed facts legitimately placed one relative to the other, legibly placed with a line forming a geometric connection between them establishing directions up, down, or sideways, that creates difficulty?
