Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (710226)	4/18/2013 3:34:46 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1576881

Tench, I suggest you read up on what a zygote is. Nothing of what you wrote makes any sense at all. The technical definition is the fused gametes. Single cell. For the "life begins at conception" crowd, the zygote should be just as valuable as every later stage of life. AFAIK, there is no test for whether a woman has a zygote, and no way should can know she has one. She might hope she has one after sex I guess. For women trying to conceive with certain conditions (age being one) the gametes do fuse, but then there are problems, and in many cases, the woman will never know she had a zygote and lost it. Biology puts very little value on zygotes, and much higher values on the later stages of life. And of course as you get old, the value goes down again. It is definitely a curve, none of the flat crap that religion teaches you.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (710226)	4/18/2013 3:51:17 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 1576881

Ten, you moron, if a woman takes a morning after pill, she loses the zygote, if there even IS one, and is totally unaware whether she prevented a pregnancy or not. She just HOPES that if she was pregnant, she no longer IS.