SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Kensington Resources Ltd. (V.KRT) * Diamond in the rough! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (789)12/7/1997 6:45:00 PM
From: John T. Hardee  Respond to of 5206
 
Zeev, You say you don't try to move stock prices by your comments. You are the worst kind of investor a company can have. I posted some of your comments about conspiring to move prices.

<<Subject: Kensington Resources Ltd. (V.KRT) * Diamond in the rough!
Message from Zeev Hed on Dec 5 1997 8:32AM EST

britt, no harm done. I just conspired to get the stock down from above 3 to $1, the rest of this stock's trek to the teenies, it did by its own little self (g). If there are diamonds in those kimbies, I am afraid that the current stockholders are going to very little of it. Any financing to continue testing and development will dilute the current holders quite severely.
Zeev >>>

<<To: Larry Brubaker (1667 )
From: Zeev Hed Sunday, Dec 7 1997 12:10PM EST
Reply # of 1670

Larry, you just hit on something very important. The pelletizing process generates such high pressure and temperatures taht indeed they are getting 1% yield of diamonds the size of the big Hope diamond. Gosh, we can start a run like we had on KRT (and it will come back down to where KRT is of course).

I'll bet you we get at least 10 posts specuulating on the value of the company if their process indeed produces diamionds <VBG>.

Zeev >>




To: Zeev Hed who wrote (789)12/7/1997 11:07:00 PM
From: mf160  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5206
 
well it looks like we should have
further considered leaving the old thread
for this one. It looks like some newbies
are not fully aware of the relations that were
developed and now don't understand certain posts
and are taking the written as fact (post 790).
But I am sure you will explain
good luck
Moreno