SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Blue Chip Gold Stocks HM, NEM, ASA, ABX, PDG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cmg who wrote (43077)4/23/2013 6:59:28 PM
From: SwampDogg4 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 48092
 
he is off point on a lot of that
paper naked short traders can continue to whack a market with never ending paper with no fear if they do not have to deliver and they have nobody telling them that what they are doing is against the law. they can also do this if they have the backing of the central banks
how can one argue that principal firms trading bonds do not know exactly what the Fed is doing?
one can argue whether it makes sense to stand in the way of that but if multiple firms all make the same BS call and then whack a market during the slowest time of the week it just plain stinks
that is nothing to do with commodity markets that is more to do with breaking rules that are already in place
gold may or may not be ready to fo higher but that is just plain crap
the gold take down was an operation and a manipulation plain and simple. they made some money but it was not becuse they were smart it was because they were big



To: cmg who wrote (43077)4/24/2013 9:22:15 AM
From: Mike M23 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 48092
 
Armstrong makes some good points however I suspect no other commodity exchange has the magnitude of "fractional reserve gold " trading 100 X paper backing the physical. I know very little about futures trading but I wonder if the exchange would allow one year of global grain production to trade in two days. It seems absurd to let paper set the price when there is essentially little physical which can be delivered. I think there are position limits. The issue raises many questions that I will look into over the weekend. I am inclined to believe the decline in gold was an orchestrated take down but I am very interested in explanations to the contrary as this will have a major impact on gold going forward.