Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (711811)	4/24/2013 9:00:31 PM
From: Wayners	Respond to of 1574098

Your naive point of view is that everybody obediently follows the law everywhere including gun shows. Your statement that no guns would be needed if people didn't break laws doesn't follow. People do break laws. You don't shut down all gun shows because people break laws. Using that logic, cars would be banned because some people speed or stores would be banned because some people steal.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (711811)	4/25/2013 11:19:51 AM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574098

The problem stems from whether members and aides set to enter the exchanges would have their health insurance premiums subsidized by their employer — in this case, the federal government. If not, aides and lawmakers in both parties fear that staffers — especially low-paid junior aides — could be hit with thousands of dollars in new health care costs, prompting them to seek jobs elsewhere. Older, more senior staffers could also retire or jump to the private sector rather than face a big financial penalty. Read more: politico.com Lawmakers, aides seek Obamacare exemption... I thought Obamacare was gonna save money I thought you could keep your existing health insurance. it was and is all LIES