Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (49301)	4/25/2013 8:55:09 AM
From: Qualified Opinion	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 223038

Most, if not all, of them are liberal. In the intermediate term, I like the other end of the trade. They are sounding desperate as failure becomes more probable. Liberals use other people's money but not their own.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (49301)	4/25/2013 8:56:36 AM
From: Fintas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 223038

Better tell em this wittle detail. Computer sector is the latest sector to drop under 50 and is in the 44 range. More importantly, a close look indicates software, telecom, internet will soon follow. So that gang best begin buying for the number or sectors to the left of 50 is now 9..soon to be 12. As this continues we will see many sectors still to the right break down.. That means many of the boring sectors such as retail, food, household goods, business etc will roll left. Like I have said..bounces should be seen for what they are. Bounces. The TREND of sectors is clearly being established that they are MOVING LEFT. My experience and data support that's not going until that sector shows the MAJORITY to the left. OR out of 39 monitored there's more to come. Rotation can absorb some of the selling but it's obvious the sector has gone from 1 to 9 and soon 12 and then 15 and then ?? It's ok to be a bull as I am. but one better remain objective. Fintas

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (49301)	4/26/2013 6:24:06 AM
From: Real Man	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 223038

This is certainly a very dangerous development of recent years, driven by Ben's QE no doubt. Central banks should not be hedge funds.