SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (42035)4/26/2013 11:08:44 AM
From: FJB1 Recommendation  Respond to of 85487
 
Total US Debt To GDP: 105%

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/26/2013 - 09:07

Now that we have the first estimate of Q1 GDP growth in both rate of change and absolute current dollar terms ($16,010 billion), we can finally assign the appropriate debt number, which we know on a daily basis and which was $16,771.4 billion as of March 31, to the growth number. The end result: as of March 31, 2013, the US debt/GDP was 104.8%, up from 103% as of December 31, 2012 or a debt growth rate that would make the most insolvent Eurozone nation blush. There was a time when people were concerned about this unsustainable trajectory, but then there was an infamous excel error, and now nobody cares anymore.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (42035)4/26/2013 12:44:38 PM
From: i-node3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
>> Court says pot smokers can be fired, even in Colo.

Nothing about the legalization of marijuana says, or should say, that employers have to hire or keep someone who is abusing drugs.

This decision won't be followed in some states as legalization proceeds, however. You think a CA court would hold with this finding?

While I'm pro-legalization, I can't see how any employer should be required to keep on a person who is failing drug tests. Or who the employer knows is getting shit faced drunk on a daily basis. We know that frequent marijuana use can reduce the drive and creativity of a person. I wouldn't want such a person working for me.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (42035)4/28/2013 1:11:02 AM
From: Brian Sullivan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 85487
 
Does this also sound right to you Brumar89?

Court says people who commit adultery can be fired even in Texas.