Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (64657)	4/30/2013 9:09:19 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

<So you used to believe NASA but now you don't. Got it.> 1.) NASA is an institution, not a piece of research, a fact, or even a hypothesis. So I can't believe one thing you say, I have to believe it ALL? Are you THAT stupid? 2.) If NASA has put something scientific forward it's traditional to quote the original research.... I suggest you do that so you don't get laughed at by quoting some idiot quoting NASA. So I'll be the first: HA haha ha ha ha ha See, when you dont't quote the original work people think you are simply trying to twist what the original source is REALLY saying OR that you don't know what you are talking about so you need to add another persons interpretation.... OH WAIT... YOU PROBABLY ARE ON BOTH COUNTS!! ROFLMAO It's amazing how inept and foolish you are turning out to be... you clearly don't know the basic underpinnings of logic or science.... to you truth is your opinion... doesn't matter how it is explained or who explains it. Too funny. DAK