SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (712476)4/30/2013 11:15:27 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1572378
 
Hillary Clinton lied under oath about Benghazi



To: longnshort who wrote (712476)4/30/2013 11:21:34 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1572378
 
Sec of State Hillary Clinton signed off on reduction of Benghazi security, contradicting her Jan testimony



To: longnshort who wrote (712476)4/30/2013 11:22:36 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1572378
 
Hillary Clinton lied... under oath... like her husband did. #2016



To: longnshort who wrote (712476)4/30/2013 11:24:57 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1572378
 
She contributes to the death of Americans abroad, lies under oath....and thats just her problems recently. And this is who liberals want to tout as being President in 2016?



To: longnshort who wrote (712476)4/30/2013 11:25:19 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1572378
 
The ability to lie under oath and never break a sweat is a resume enhancer in her party.






To: longnshort who wrote (712476)4/30/2013 11:25:34 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1572378
 
Obama does it every time he speaks






To: longnshort who wrote (712476)4/30/2013 11:29:49 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1572378
 
A top Democratic 2016 Presidential candidate lies under oath. What difference does it make?

This should be on the front page of every newspaper in the country tomorrow. But, it won't be. It won't even be in most newspapers period. Politicians lie to the people, and the slanted media picks and chooses which ones they want to focus on depending on their agenda.





To: longnshort who wrote (712476)4/30/2013 12:43:56 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1572378
 
Hearing in Cole Attack Is Delayed Again, This Time by E-mail Security Issue (Al Nashiri)
...................................................................................................
The New York Times ^ | April 11, 2013 | CHARLIE SAVAGE