SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael Dunn who wrote (1959)12/5/1997 1:31:00 PM
From: limtex  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Sorry to be a bit negative but I don't think further discussion of this subject on the internetis helpful at this time.



To: Michael Dunn who wrote (1959)12/6/1997 1:51:00 AM
From: Craig Freeman  Respond to of 60323
 
Michael (apologies to all), your response tested my search skills but I finally managed to come up with a link to explain my claim:

shum.cc.huji.ac.il

According to this article, Earth survey photography is commonly performed from aircraft using a 9" x 9" film camera and a 6" focal length lens. The film has a resolution of 8 microns, providing 1,125,000 pixels along each dimension. When digitized at 15u, it takes 230MB to store one image.

Since the lowest altitude once can reasonably use to define a "satellite" is above the stratosphere (approx. 40 miles) and a dime is approx. 1/2" in diameter, my computations yield a ratio of 5 million to one.

Although the difference between "usual and customary" and "the dime challenge" is more than 4:1, I dare say that the Feds may well have engineered a longer focal length lens with the same resolution or have paired a crisper 6" lens with higher resolution film.

You plunk the apparatus in a rocket, fly it around the world once and recover the film. What I don't understand is why anyone would need to resolve a dime in the first place.

Craig