Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Riskmgmt who wrote (41551)	12/5/1997 12:17:00 PM
From: Paul Dieterich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

The NY Times article on Intel's digital TV software: Intel Displays Digital TV Software December 5, 1997 By JOEL BRINKLEY Intel Corp. demonstrated new software Thursday that would enable personal computers to receive digital, high-definition television signals -- providing a possible end to a format war the computer industry has fought against the broadcasting and consumer-electronics industries. Since early this year, Intel and its allies -- Microsoft Corp. and Compaq Computer Corp. -- have urged broadcasters and manufacturers of television sets to abandon high-definition in favor of the lower-resolution digital signals that the computer industry favors. The companies said they wanted to build digital-television receivers into personal computers starting next year. But they said they could not hold prices down if the PCs were required to receive all 18 display formats set out in the digital television system the broadcasters and TV-set makers have established. The computer industry said that its new TV-equipped personal computers would go dark when receiving HDTV signals that the networks plan to begin broadcasting next year. That move started a loud and angry row with broadcasters and set makers that has lasted much of this year. Unlike its partners, Intel has been saying for several months that PCs should be able to receive any signal. The demonstration Thursday in its Santa Clara, Calif., offices was of software based on a format converter developed by Hitachi America Ltd. It receives any of the 18 formats, including HDTV signals, and converts that format into one for display on TVs -- and on computer monitors. "Our objective is to remove barriers between us and the broadcasters," said Ron Whittier, a senior vice president for Intel. "The format issue was an unfortunate discussion that sidetracked us from making investments and getting on with implementation." Jack Fuhrer, senior director for research and development at Hitachi, agreed. "There's no reason for a format war," he said. "With the converter, you can have a production in high-definition and watch a converted signal on a computer, and it will look fine." Hitachi is not the only company that has produced a format converter. Matsushita Electric Corp. has shown a similar product, and other consumer-electronics companies have said they are working on similar devices. Intel and Hitachi have no business agreement, but Fuhrer said he believed his company would charge a small licensing fee. "My hope is that, now that Intel has said yes, other computer companies will come in, and this thing will snowball," he said. Steve Goldberg, director for corporate development for Compaq, said his company had not seen Intel's software and was not ready to say what it might mean. "It's unclear right now; these things are still in the lab, and we are evaluating a number of different approaches." Microsoft declined to comment. A price has not been set for the Intel-Hitachi software, but Whittier said that starting sometime next year, computers would be available equipped with it as well as with a digital television-receiver board costing about $200. These machines could receive HDTV signals, though initially signals would be converted for display on the computers at a lower resolution. But by sometime in 1999, he said, "we believe computing power will have increased so that we can display on high-definition monitors."

To: Riskmgmt who wrote (41551)	12/5/1997 8:21:00 PM
From: Fred Fahmy	Respond to of 186894

Ray, <FF: Just wanted to say that I really appreciate your sensible and well tought out posts.> Thanks for the kind words. I used to post a lot more on this thread but it seems that very few (excluding some of the INTC veterans) are interested in long term investing or long term perspectives. I have been finding the discussions on some of the other Intel threads a little more meaningful, although I have been mostly only reading lately. As an Intel investor I am always interested in hearing contrarian views and potential concerns. As Andy said, 'only the paranoid survive'. However, all I hear on this thread are the same concerns I have heard for years. It's interesting how the more things change the more they stay the same. How many times have I listened to how Intel's dominance is in danger?? When I look at Intel, I see a company more dominant than ever; apparently so does the DOJ. Fortunately, having incompetent competitors with poor strategies is not against the law, at least not yet <ggg>. I still find this thread (as well as the others) useful for news links even if I have to wade through a bunch of shallow, short-sighted, anti-Intel hype. You will notice that the worse and worse AMD and Cyrix do, more and more negative Intel hype appears on this thread. I guess for some, this is a way to vent their fustration. Good luck, FF