SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Post-Crash Index-Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GST who wrote (90077)5/3/2013 5:42:08 PM
From: Broken_Clock2 Recommendations  Respond to of 119360
 
This is the gov't we owe out allegiance to?

++++

"The sad truth is Obama’s major achievement in human rights is to make George Bush seem like a civil libertarian."

WEEKEND EDITION MAY 3-5, 2013

What's in a Name?
Is Obama’s Gitmo Statement Merely a PR Stunt?
by ALAN MACLEOD
My old dad always told me that, in politics, talk is cheap. You judge people by their actions, not their words. That is why I am not particularly hopeful when it comes to Obama closing Guantanamo Bay prison. This week, at the White House, the President stated the controversial jail was “not necessary to keep America safe.” He went on to explain why he feels it should close: “It is expensive. It is inefficient. It hurts us, in terms of our international standing. It lessens cooperation with our allies on counter-terrorism efforts.”

At no point did the President cite its gross immorality or its illegality under international law as factors, rather, it is simply a costly public relations nightmare for Washington. Obama appears quite happy to hold people without trial around the world, in less infamous jails. Indeed, in 2009, the Obama administration planned to simply transfer the Guantanamo inmates to a small prison in rural Illinois, far from the eyes of the foreign press.

Obama’s announcement comes in response to a mass hunger strike, now in its third month, which has led to growing international scrutiny of the cruel and unusual conditions at the prison. Increasing numbers of people are questioning why the US has a base there at all.

Back to History Class

The US intervened in the Cuban War of Independence, forcing the Spanish out, making way for US business interests. They pressurized exhausted Cuba into granting all manner of concessions, including signing a lease to allow the US to use the port as a coaling station. This coaling station evolved into a military base, and, eventually, what we have now. This despite strong protests from the Cuban government.

Described as the “gulag of our times” by Amnesty International, inmates are subjected to psychological, physical and sexual torture. “They used dogs on us” says Al-Jazeera journalist Sami al-Haj, released after six years without charge. “They beat me, sometimes they hung me from the ceiling and didn’t allow me to sleep for six days.” Violence is so prevalent that even the guards are not immune. In 2003, Sean Baker, an undercover US National Guardsman playing the role of a prisoner in a training exercise, was beaten so violently he suffered serious brain damage.Before his election, President Obama promised he would do everything in his power to close the unpopular prison. He even signed an order to close it in 2009, which was later, quietly, forgotten.

Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics

According to the American Civil Liberties Union, nearly 800 people have been incarcerated at the jail, including at least 21 children like Canadian citizen Omar Khadr. Today, there are still 166 inmates from 23 countries. 86 of them were cleared for release in 2009 but remain interned. Even according to the Obama administration, 92% of the inmates have never been Al-Qaeda operatives. Only 12 are evenaccused of terrorism. The Bush administration released 532 inmates, Obama, just 72. Those that are charged will be taken to the Orwellian-named “Camp Justice”, to receive a military tribunal.

Despite his carefully chosen words about freedom and peace, President Obama has intensified the war in Afghanistan, violated Pakistan and Yemen’s national sovereignty with drone attacks, and continued to interfere in Americans’ privacy at home. The sad truth is Obama’s major achievement in human rights is to make George Bush seem like a civil libertarian.
Until the President backs up his rosy words with concrete action, there is little reason to rejoice. The message should be “close Guantanamo, yes, but what about the still-open Abu Grahib and all the other detention centres round the world which have brought shame to America?”

A wise man once said “fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.”

Time will tell if we are all being fooled again.

Alan Macleod can be reached at: alan_macleod11@hotmail.com.



To: GST who wrote (90077)5/3/2013 7:08:52 PM
From: benwood9 Recommendations  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 119360
 
I don't agree with your comment on defined benefit plans. The fact that you can define it doesn't make it rational. Defined contributions plans, which also are easily defined as compensation, impose no future risk nor future taxes. The catastrophes in California and elsewhere (including in my own state of Washington) are self evident. And the potential for abuse is significant and generally not known to the public (legal and common in Calif. and Wash. via one trick or another to jack up the final number used in the formula or to defer funding until some future date).

You must realize that defined contribution plans, a kin to an IRA, is all about personal responsibility. And those plans are not only defined as part of the compensation package, but paid for contemporaneously. No avenue for abuse, no triggering of a future default or bankruptcy, nothing to raid. I don't think you have any sound argument that can top the complete personal responsibility of maintaining one's own self-directed retirement plan.

My reference to having medical procedure costs to be discoverable has to do with allowing millions of people to price shop for medical care and thus become empowered to pick and choose. I would love to see some form of health care which largely worked out as major medical (i.e. big deductibles for most things) and thus price discovery mattered greatly to consumers, and those who took care of themselves benefit not only from better health but financially as well. People do this when the shop for cars and other major items.

Allow people to opt out of the retirement portion of SS -- perhaps 80% of it? Let me invest it myself.

In the end, however, I say follow the money. The dramatic shift in wealth in the past 40 years does not point to the 350 million, it points to 1 million. People did not say corporations were people, the corporate controlled gov't did.

There is a lot people could to to be personally responsible for their lives. Save money. (Eliminate the Fed). You could eliminate FDIC insurance, but the gov't allows the obfuscation of solvency and fraud (which goes back to my previous post). You can't make people responsible for knowing what's happening to their money when it's legally a secret and people committing fraud know they are immune (i.e. TBTF banks).

So long as gov't works for the elite, what the people do to be responsible for themselves will only go so far. Say gov't is debasing your currency, and you buy gold. Sounds smart unless the gov't confiscates it. Again, the rules changed from without.

I'm a believer in personal responsibility and accountability, and personal education. I avoid MSM like the plague. I am conscious when I walk around. But I'm surrounded by idiots -g- And you can't change others...

Anyway, I only have a vague notion of where you are trying to go with this, so you might as well elaborate.