Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (713148)	5/3/2013 9:12:04 PM
From: puborectalis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578704

the recession was caused by a financial crisis and thus would take longer from which to recover. In fact, economists say that recessions caused by financial crises, like the most recent recession, are more severe and have a much longer recovery time than other recessions.

To: i-node who wrote (713148)	5/4/2013 7:42:45 AM
From: Alighieri	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578704

Yeah, Bush was in the WH when the music stopped. But neither you nor any other liberal can point to ANYTHING Bush did that might have left him with the slightest responsibility for it. Just another one of those little things you dont' really have any answer for. That's not what you said...you said, and I quote " The economic "free fall" was stopped by GWB before Obama took office;" That is FALSE. a) you absolve bush from responsibility even though in the last quarter of his tenure the economy shrunk by 9% and unemployment was climbing for months thereafter. b) you give him credit for STOPPING these things before Obama took office, even though the data shows otherwise c) in another claim, you blame obama for "radical" action to save GM, even though bush started the process...GM is now a healthy and thriving company again, despite your doomsday predictions You've turned out to be wrong on just about every prediction you've made. Do you want to know why? It is because your thoughts are tainted with total bias. It allows you to take anectodal cherry picked tid bits and turn them into "truth". Good analysis doesn't work that way. You can play around with the words if you like, but both have used the term to describe Obamacare. You can say, "Oh, they're just talking about the implementation." Both of them made it very clear in their statement that they are talking about implementation. The rest is your editorializing without ANY EVIDENCE provided. Al