Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Blue Chip Gold Stocks HM, NEM, ASA, ABX, PDG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rubbersoul who wrote (43365)	5/4/2013 12:20:21 AM
From: gold$10k	1 Recommendation Respond to of 48092

Whom shall I blame if I don't get the chance to buy more gold at $1200. <g>

To: rubbersoul who wrote (43365)	5/4/2013 5:21:18 AM
From: Wade	Respond to of 48092

Charting interprets prices actions if you based on the assumption of having a free gold market. Furthermore, when trust in official currency can change very rapidly as well. It is all perception.

To: rubbersoul who wrote (43365)	5/4/2013 7:15:44 AM
From: orkrious	13 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 48092

Do you agree with Louise Yamada in the article? She clearly feels gold is headed to 1200 and 1530s is a long shot and will be short lived if it gets there. She is probably better than anyone on SI with technical analysis. I never understood why people read her. Other when gold's bear market was ending in the early 2000s, has she ever had anything worthwhile to say? Even when gold was $500 and ascending, she put out research showing a wide range of possibilities, always with huge downside potential. It was no different at $800. Sure, there was upside potential, too. But I can't think of a better person who exemplifies "technical analysis tells you what you should have done after you should have done it." Yamada is so useless I never read a word she has to say.