Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Blasher who wrote (49776)	5/7/2013 1:27:18 PM
From: Fintas	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 218589

The four numbers are to see it from a macro view to a micro view. Yes they are value boxes. I could have thrown in a 4.86 which is a controlling box but most wouldn't understand how I use that. Yet I can say 163.18. That says something to me. It's also why I presented the fluff side of things. Things often go beyond x points or % but to me that's FLUFF. So if you pull up a pnf and use 3 box reversals.. Plugging in the numbers presented it will allow one to see what we've done near term. What we can do. Yet that 4.86 not viewed also says..OK this is what we've done from the 138.88 and 143.74. Count em up. How many MORE do we get to do? More importantly how many DOWN. 1? 2? 3? That is strings of 4.86. In the world of strings that I run it's clear to me as I look at the weight of data. We are TOPPY in both sequence and other. Thus.. the PUT. EVERY tick up says to me..We get closer to rollng over. And of course there will be those disagreeing and trying to fight it as the strings play out to the downside as they are now doing to the upside. Whether it be GOLD, APPLE, SPX.. doesn't matter to me. What does matter to me is the weight of data. IMHO Fintas