SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : How Quickly Can Obama Totally Destroy the US? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Honey_Bee who wrote (2805)5/10/2013 10:31:45 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 16547
 
Benghazi Talking Points: A Lie Hillary Agreed Upon
................................................................................................................
Investor's Business Daily ^
| May 10, 2013 | IBD EDITORIALS


Libya: At least a dozen rewrites of the Benghazi talking points were made, with all references to al-Qaida and prior attacks removed at the direction of the secretary of state's office.

The astonishing thing about the administration's Benghazi cover-up is that it actually thought it could get away with it. But each lie has been successfully peeled away, from the protest that never happened, to the irrelevant filmmaker who was blamed, to the intelligence community whose talking points were used as a cover for incompetence and malfeasance.

Now White House and State Department emails obtained by ABC News, some first published by the Weekly Standard, show that the intelligence community, led by the CIA, told the truth about terrorist involvement in the Benghazi attacks and prior warnings in its original talking points draft. It was the White House and the State Department that lied and had them altered.

"Those talking points originated from the intelligence community. They reflect the IC's best assessments of what they thought had happened," White House Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters last Nov. 28. "The White House and the State Department have made clear that the single adjustment that was made to those talking points by either of those two institutions were changing the word 'consulate' to 'diplomatic facility' because 'consulate' was inaccurate."

What the talking points reflected, after a dozen heavy edits dictated by the State Department, was a sanitized version designed to protect President Obama's re-election chances and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's prospective candidacy in 2016. They were deliberately altered to eliminate references to terrorism so the whole thing could be blamed on an inflammatory video and no one in the administration could be held responsible.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (2805)5/11/2013 10:57:53 AM
From: joseffy4 Recommendations  Respond to of 16547
 
READ the sign behind Obama Stooge Carney as he is grilled on Benghazi



The white washing



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (2805)5/11/2013 1:37:51 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
The Internal Revenue Service admitted Friday to improperly targeting conservative groups

Here are some of the things they wanted to know about those grou
ps.

1. We’re gonna need all your direct and indirect communication. “‘Direct and indirect communications’ is profoundly chilling of First Amendment rights, ” said David French, senior counsel for American Center for Law & Justice, which has been representing 27 conservative organizations met with IRS inquisitions. “It’s so vague as to be impossible to comply with.”



2. What do we need to know about your members? Nothing much. Just ALL THE THINGS!


3. Your present and past employees and their relationships, please.



4. No, family members of past and present board members and employees are not exempt, nor are their activities with other groups. Why do you ask?




5. If someone in this country’s free press has ever interacted with you in any way shape or form about your free speech activities, we’re going to need documentation of that.



<edit>

10. Please predict the future reliably. Thank you for your time.







All of the examples above are taken from actual IRS correspondence received by ACLJ’s 27 clients.

<edit>

A 2011 letter from Rep. Darrell Issa and Rep. Jim Jordan laid out 16 areas of the Tea Party questionnaires that seemed to overreach. Here they are.

Article



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (2805)5/12/2013 7:40:25 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 16547
 
Potential Witnesses Who May Face Issa's Oversight Committee In Near Future
.................................................................................

by Kerry Picket 12 May 2013
breitbart.com


Hillary Clinton

Clinton testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in January, angrily screeching, “What difference does it make?” to Senator Ron Johnson’s inquiry about the administration’s declaration that the attack resulted from protests that got out of control over an online video. Hicks told the Oversight Committee, “I think at about 2 p.m. the — 2 a.m., sorry, the Secretary of State Clinton called me along with her senior staff were all on the phone, and she asked me what was going on.” Hicks said that their conversation revolved around the search for Ambassador Stevens and evacuating personnel from the consulate. Her State Department lawyers, Hicks testified, did not want Hicks cooperating with the Oversight Committee investigation along with the acting deputy mission chief. Additionally Clinton put together the ARB team to investigate the State Department’s actions before during and after the attack, yet those assigned to the ARB never interviewed Clinton herself.


General Carter Ham

Ham was Commander of U.S. AFRICOM during the attack on the U.S. diplomatic post and CIA annex in Benghazi. Hicks was asked by Rep. Ron DeSantis (R–FL) who ultimately issued the “stand down” order to Lieutenant Colonel Gibson that kept military assistance from helping the Americans under attack in Benghazi. “He did not identify the person,” Hicks responded, adding that he also did not know if the “stand down order” came from Ham (the combatant commander), Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta or President Obama. Hicks also could not confirm to Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R–UT) if Ham was in Washington D.C., Stuttgart or AFRICOM's headquarters when the attack happened. Ham retired from the Army in April.


Cheryl Mills

For several months Rep. Jason Chaffetz investigated the Benghazi attack for the Committee and found that he was being blocked from meeting with Hicks alone by the State Department. Hicks testified State Department general counsel Cheryl Mills became “very upset” when she discovered Department lawyers were excluded from classified briefings. They did not have appropriate clearances for the briefings held at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, given by Rep. Chaffetz and his Congressional delegation to Hicks. According to Hicks, Mills telephoned him and wanted a report about the meeting.

“A phone call from that senior a person is generally not considered to be good news,” Hicks said Wednesday. Hicks told the Committee that State Department lawyers did not want him talking to Chaffetz or anyone from the Oversight Committee without State Department attorneys present. Eventually, Hicks says Mills demoted him to another position at the State Department. Mills first worked for the Clintons on their transition team, when Bill Clinton was elected to the White House in 1992.

Leon Panetta

As Secretary of Defense, Panetta testified in February, "Soon after the initial reports about the attack, the president ordered all available DOD assets to respond to the attack in Libya and to protect U.S. personnel and interests in the region.”

Panetta went further saying, “Some have asked why other types of armed aircraft were not dispatched to Benghazi. The reason is, because armed UAVs, AC-130 gun ships or fixed wing fighters with associated tanking armaments, targeting and support capabilities were not in the vicinity of Libya, and because of the distance would have taken at least 9 to 12 hours if not, more to deploy. This was pure and simple a problem of distance and time.”

However, questions remain as to who ultimately gave the order to American military assets in or near Libya at least two times to “stand down” and not engage in the fight in Benghazi. Hicks testified that a C-130 Libyan transport had been provided and he told Colonel Gibson to give reinforcement to Benghazi to help withdraw personnel. Gibson, Hicks said, told him he was commanded to “stand down.”

Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy


Mark Thompson testified last Wednesday that the Foreign Emergency Support Team (FEST), the U.S. government's only interagency on-call short notice team poised to respond to terrorist attacks worldwide, was kept from deploying to Benghazi. Thompson wrote in a September 11th, 2012 e-mail to State Department Undersecretary Kennedy's deputy, read aloud by Chaffetz, "I am told that Pat Kennedy participated in a very senior conference call with the White House and discouraged the FEST option.” Thompson says he was told that the FEST option would be too “unsafe.” Thompson later testified that he was excluded from senior meetings about the attack when he tried to readdress it with Kennedy’s staff two days later.

Beth Jones

Jones is the acting assistant secretary for Near Eastern Affairs at the State Department. In an e-mail to Sec. Clinton on Sept. 12, a day after the attack and a few days before Rice’s Sunday TV appearances, Jones wrote, "I spoke to the Libyan ambassador and emphasized importance of Libyan leaders continuing to make strong statements," adding, "When he said his government suspected that former Gadhafi regime elements carried out the attacks, I told him that the group that conducted the attacks Ansar Al Sharia is affiliated with Islamic terrorists."

Jones was reportedly aware that al Qaeda affiliates were behind the attack against the compound in Benghazi, yet that information was omitted from the talking points. Furthermore, Hicks told the Committee that when he questioned Jones about why the administration decided to blame the attack on an online video that instigated a protest, Jones appeared to want to drop the subject.

“The sense I got was that I needed to stop the line of questioning,” Hicks told Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH). According to Hicks, his relationship with State Department superiors began to deteriorate from there.

General David Petraeus

Petraeus voiced his frustration in an e-mail with the administration when his talking points were edited. "We couldn't even mention the Cairo warning. But he added, "it's their call," referring to White House Advisors. Petraeus testified about the Benghazi attack before the House and Senate intelligence committees in late 2012, so his testimony remains classified. He was forced out of his position as CIA chief in November 2012 after it was revealed he was involved in an extra-marital affair.


Victoria Nuland

Nuland, the State Department spokeswoman at the time, injected herself into the twelve revisions of the post Benghazi attack talking points. ABC News reports on an email chain, Nuland was part of, among White House, State Department and intelligence agencies illustrating how the final version went through a series of edits that wiped references to prior terror warnings in Benghazi. Nuland, in one particular e-mail correspondence, did not want to include the CIA’s reference to intel regarding the threat via al Qaeda in Benghazi and eastern Libya. That "could be abused by members (of Congress) to beat up the State Department for not paying attention to warnings, so why would we want to feed that either? Concerned," Nuland wrote.

Ben Rhodes

Rhodes, White House Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications and Speechwriting, responded to Nuland’s e-mail saying her concerns were valid and would be resolved. It should be noted that Rhodes is also brother to David Rhodes, President of CBS News. CBS News is reportedly frustrated with investigative reporter Sharyl Atikisson, who has been heavily covering the Benghazi attack, accusing Atkisson of “advocacy,” network sources told Politico. Apparently, according to reports, Atkisson “can’t get some of her stories on the air.”

U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice

Rice testified behind closed doors last November to the Senate about what she knew about the administration's handling of the attack. It still remains unclear as to who told U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to falsely claim on five Sunday television news shows that the attacks on the U.S. consulate and CIA annex in Benghazi was instigated from an online video, posted by a California resident. The White House continues to pass the responsibility of the faulty information about the video to bad intelligence coming from the CIA. Rice did the same at a speech in November. Additionally Susan Rice used the revised talking points the State Department pushed for when she appeared on these shows. An interim report last month by House Republicans on five committees showed how Congress could use the original version of the talking points to criticize the administration’s handling of the terrorist threat in Benghazi before the attack in September.



Finally, below are individuals Hicks named in his testimony who are part of the U.S. Mission Libya staff. It will not be a surprise if someone on this list also appears before Congress to discuss what they know about the Benghazi attack and the administration’s attempt to explain itself afterward.

Regional Security Officer (Benghazi) – Alec Henderson



Regional Security Officer (Tripoli) – John Martinec



Ambassador Stevens’ Agent in Charge – Scott Wickland



Political Section Chief – David McFarland



Embassy Tripoli Nurse – Jackie Levesque



Management Officer – Allen Greenfield



Lieutenant Colonel Phillips



Lieutenant Colonel Arnt



Lieutenant Colonel Gibson



Mark Si (Team Tripoli)