SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (714613)5/10/2013 11:15:21 PM
From: Wayners1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578565
 
The motive is to win the election by denying that a major terror attack occurred on his watch. Terror attacks that you were warned about in advance and that you did nothing about beforehand and during don't go over so well when played on TV just before an election. I don't think Al Sharia likes Obammy too much and they intended to avenge 9/11 and also get Obammy the Drone Driver kicked out of the WH at the same time. A video...what a friggin joke. A teenager could have come up with a better lie than that.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (714613)5/10/2013 11:24:54 PM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578565
 
Top GOP Senator Says Obama Could Be Impeached Over ‘Most Egregious Cover-Up in American History’

The Blaze ^ | May 10, 2013 | Madeleine Morgenstern


The top-ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee said President Barack Obama could possibly be impeached over what happened in Benghazi.

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) said in a radio interview Thursday that “of all the great cover-ups in history” — including the Pentagon papers, Iran-Contra and Watergate — Benghazi “is going to go down as most serious, most egregious cover-up in American history.”

“We may be starting to use the I-word before too long,” Inhofe said on the Las Vegas-based “Rusty Humphries Show.”

“The I-word meaning impeachment?” Humphries asked.

“Yeah,” Inhofe confirmed.

When Humphries questioned the likelihood of impeachment, Inhofe said it wouldn’t be immediate.....

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (714613)5/11/2013 9:43:40 AM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578565
 
" You are directly accusing Obama of intentionally killing those 4 people.... What would be his motive "

are you stupid ? his motive was to get re-elected, it's all about him and not the country, that's treason and what do they do with traitors ?



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (714613)5/11/2013 10:05:37 AM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578565
 
Hillary Clinton fired from Watergate committee for fraud, ethics violations

Did you know Hillary Clinton was a member of the impeachment inquiry staff in Washington, D.C.? Clinton was advising the House Committee on the Judiciary during the Watergate scandal back in 1974. I didn’t either until I read her Wikipedia entry. I also discovered another rather interesting story. Back in 2008 when Clinton was running against Obama in the Democrat primary the Digital Journal ran a revealing story. The story says Hillary Clinton was fired from the committee staff. Jerry Zeifman, supervised Hillary Clinton during the Watergate impeachment inquiry. He refused to give her a letter of recommendation because of her lies and unethical behavior. Clinton obtained a position on the committee staff through her political patronage of her former Yale law school professor Burke Marshall and Chappaquiddick Senator Ted Kennedy. Jerry Zeifman says Hillary Clinton was unethical and a liar (as if we didn’t already know that.) He also described Hillary Clinton as a dishonest lawyer. Finally, Zeifman says Hillary Clinton conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality. Sound familiar? Like Benghazi maybe? Zeifman had this reaction after Hillary Clinton’s phony tears at a campaign rally in 2008:

My own reaction was of regret that, when I terminated her employment on the Nixon impeachment staff, I had not reported her unethical practices to the appropriate bar associations.

Digital Journal also had this on Hillary Clinton:

engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation by stealing Judiciary Committee files on the only precedent case that could have stonewalled their plot and drafting a legal brief that, according to Mr. Ziefman, “was so fraudulent and ridiculous Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.”

Isn’t it amazing and ironic? Hillary Clinton who is involved in the worst government cover-up since Watergate was on the Watergate investigation panel as a young pup back in ’74. I guess history does repeat itself.