SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Solon who wrote (36270)5/13/2013 11:00:23 PM
From: Greg or e2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 69300
 
Are you now trying to claim that the current levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are unsafe on top of claiming that CO2 is a pollutant?

You're not too bright are you?



To: Solon who wrote (36270)5/19/2013 1:17:53 PM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 69300
 
The scam collapses

It is becoming gradually clear, even to the True Believers in the Scientific Consensus, that the Global Warming Fairy isn't arriving after all:
The Economist, which (despite a recent decline) remains probably the best news magazine in the English language, now admits that (a) global average temperature has been flat for 15 years even as CO2 levels have been rising rapidly, (b) surface temperatures are at the lowest edge of the range predicted by IPCC climate models, (c) on current trends, they will soon fall clean outside and below the model predictions, (c) estimates of climate sensitivity need revising downwards, and (d) something, probably multiple things, is badly wrong with AGW climate models. Something is badly wrong with AGW climate models? You don't say. It won't be long before they'll be similarly admitting that there is something badly wrong with the TENS models... or at least, they would if such models even existed.

Talk of "global warming" and even "climate change" has become so sparse these days that I actually had to dust off the post label.

Labels: AGW/CC