Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (716084)	5/17/2013 7:56:37 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1578930

No, I am stating the facts. Zimmerman decided to play vigilante, stalked an innocent teen and killed him. LOL, but you aren't judging him.....ROFLMAO!!! Judging? No..........its based on the police reports. Have you read them..........or did you get all your 'facts' from Fox News? Zimmerman provoked a confrontation and murdered Martin. A jury must decide if it was in self defense. I have already pointed this out "murder" is a legal term. If you use the term "murder" and he hasn't been convicted by a jury of murder, then you are judging him. If you don't want to judge him, then you can use the word "killed" or "homicide", but not murder. And if you say that Zimmerman provoked the confrontation, that too is judging. And unfortunately for you, Trayvon and his family, all physical evidence suggests that Trayvon instigated the violence and was dominating Zimmerman right up to the point that Zimmerman shot and killed Trayvon. Based on the facts, its my opinion that Zimmerman murdered Martin. I know that my opinion does not comport with what his attorney is putting out there but then his attorney has been employed to defend his client.