Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (39882)	5/21/2013 1:33:06 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	2 Recommendations Respond to of 86356

hey Eric, do you like you buddies Land Shark and rat brain declare the following to be 4 lies. The info is from the jonova.s3.amazonaws.com jonova.s3.amazonaws.com/sh1/the_skeptics_handbook_2-3_lq.pdf The temperature of an particular month is proof only that one can calculate temperature of that month. It has no meaning of cause or effect of CO2 in the current global temperature rising or falling. The missing signature is convincing proof of the inaccuracy of the CO2 driven global warming models. Also the predicted hot spot would in fact violate the laws of thermodynamics. But that is over most folks IQ. The violation of the laws of thermodynamics proves that any who believe in CO2 are quite stupid in their comprehension of the laws of physics as the pertain to heat transfer. The ice core data is convincing proof that global warming cause CO2 to rise and thus temp not CO2 is the driver. The mechanism the explains this can be figured out by understanding the oceans contains the most CO2 waterencyclopedia.com Do you believe this wiki page was written by skeptics. LOL... Then there is the idea of saturation. Those who deny it or do not understand it are simply IQ impaired. It is so obvious to me.