Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (716825)	5/21/2013 3:48:32 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583391

she as also in the middle of her and her husband getting a license to own and operate an old folks home after they had invested a lot of time and money. you think the state would have given her that license ?

To: i-node who wrote (716825)	5/21/2013 7:15:51 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1583391

We know why. There is no doubt about it. She clearly stated the reason, which was, what chance did SHE have taking on a powerful figure like Clinton? Nonsense. There wasn't a there there.........that's why she didn't take it on. And she was right. She would have been smeared just like Jones was. Jones smeared herself with all the shit she pulled after getting a nearly million dollar settlement from Clinton..........like going into the boxing ring. You Rs never seem to learn............when you're going to put up a ringer, at least find one that has some character.