SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (717114)5/22/2013 6:21:29 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1583398
 
CJ,
Umm, Tenchu, they were under Bush.
I'll call your bluff.

Link or it's a lie.

Tenchusatsu



To: combjelly who wrote (717114)5/22/2013 6:59:15 PM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1583398
 
>> they were under Bush.

Bush Administration officials may not have been alter boys.

But never, during the Bush administration, did you see scandals like this. You can come back and tell us about lies and wars, but every thinking person recognizes there were no lies and frankly, the ONLY "scandal" you can point to was the outing of Plame, who was already "out" and therefore it was not a significant event.

The Left tried constantly to create scandals during the Bush years. There was the "scandal" where Dick Cheney had the nerve to have a meeting with with oil company officials, a totally legitimate and unscandalous event. What a joke.

To make matters worse, these Obama scandals were, all four of these which have now come to light, politically motivated and clearly covered up to avoid a fair election on the basis of the facts. And it worked -- a totally unqualified, corrupt politician was reelected based on misleading the American public.

No, there were no scandals under Bush. There were news reports. News reports are necessary, but not sufficient to create a scandal. Those news reports must lead to public outrage.

Your defense of Obama is beyond disgusting and beyond hypocritical.



To: combjelly who wrote (717114)5/22/2013 7:48:57 PM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1583398
 
Flaccid Weiner Goes Limp in New Poll

He need CJ's help again though CJ let him down last time.

jammiewf.com



To: combjelly who wrote (717114)5/23/2013 7:41:03 AM
From: jlallen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1583398
 
Lie.

Why must you pinheads lie so much?

How is that Weiner hacking investigation coming??? lol



To: combjelly who wrote (717114)5/23/2013 1:38:11 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583398
 


PREMATURE ELECTION: CUOMO SLAPS WEINER