SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (39939)5/22/2013 10:44:44 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 86356
 
Apparently it had quite a major impact as it utilized all the available nitrates in the region..
But the effect was short-lived as the extra iron resulted in the rapid removal of biological nitrate, depriving the phytoplankton of nitrogen they also needed.


But that was a natural event.. and it's NOT representative of other HNLC zones where there are high quantities of nitrates, but very little iron..

Iron doesn't float.. it sinks to the bottom, if not utilized.. It may be churned up by various upwellings, but it will sink to the bottom again..

and I can tell you this is the driest 4 months in Calif recorded history.

Was a pretty dry winter in Idaho too.. Water levels in the reservoirs are down quite a bit..

Didn't snow much here because it was too freaking cold to snow for most of the winter.. what did fall stuck around..




To: Wharf Rat who wrote (39939)5/23/2013 11:12:05 AM
From: Thomas A Watson3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86356
 
Dear Rat, as one of this threads most ardent science deniers, why should anyone care if surface temps are skewed or not. A million surface temp measurements are not as accurate as a satellite measurements that are automatically taking into account all albedo variations in real time.

To the purest science denier, examples like this are ignored.